This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "OO CR162-797 Patient Report Request"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Issue) |
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{OO | + | {{OO Closed V2.9 Change Requests}} |
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
== Recommended Action Items == | == Recommended Action Items == | ||
| + | |||
| + | OO WGM - Sept 16, 2014 Tuesday q4 | ||
| + | |||
| + | This needs a fair bit of work. Was discussed on the LRI call, and may no longer be urgent. Consult Hans/Ken regarding appropriate next steps | ||
== Resolution == | == Resolution == | ||
| + | *Oct 7, 2015 - Motion to not accept the proposal and advise to use the existing PRT value of Results Copies To, PRT-5 to identify the person, and as needed use PRT-6 to indicate whether that person is the patient, guardian, parent, etc. To resolve indication to not provide certain information to a specific person, we suggest that for now we should use NTEs. Riki Merrick, David Burgess | ||
| + | ** Against: 0; Abstain:3; In Favor: 7 | ||
Latest revision as of 18:25, 7 October 2015
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Ken McCaslin - on behalf of ONC | Revision date: <<Revision Date>> |
| Submitted date: 16 June 2014 | Change request ID: OO CR162 |
| Standard/IG: Standard | Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>> |
Issue
The proposal - Media:20140616OOWG-162HL7-797PatientExcessV4.docx
In 2013 in the US the changes were made to provide the patient with direct access to their reports. Need to have a mechanism to capture the patient, the patient's advocate, the patient's guardain, and/or the patient's parents request for the report and collect the destination of the report. ONC needs this for this rule making cycle, therefore it would be highly desirable to have it in proposed version 2.8.2 and updated in the LRI IG and LOI IGs.
Recommendation
Rationale
Discussion
Recommended Action Items
OO WGM - Sept 16, 2014 Tuesday q4
This needs a fair bit of work. Was discussed on the LRI call, and may no longer be urgent. Consult Hans/Ken regarding appropriate next steps
Resolution
- Oct 7, 2015 - Motion to not accept the proposal and advise to use the existing PRT value of Results Copies To, PRT-5 to identify the person, and as needed use PRT-6 to indicate whether that person is the patient, guardian, parent, etc. To resolve indication to not provide certain information to a specific person, we suggest that for now we should use NTEs. Riki Merrick, David Burgess
- Against: 0; Abstain:3; In Favor: 7
