This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "OO CR139-771 - Supporting Clinical Information"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
{{OO Accepted V2.8.2 Change Requests}}
[[Category:OO Accepted V2.8.2 Change Requests]]
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page.
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page.

Latest revision as of 15:11, 18 July 2014

Return to OO Change Requests page.

Submitted by: Hans Buitendijk Revision date: <<Revision Date>>
Submitted date: 11 September 2013 Change request ID: OO CR139-771
Standard/IG: Standard Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>>


See File:OO CR139-771.docx for current proposal (due to bug in wiki software, cannot upload .doc to original version trail.)

See File:OO CR139-771.doc for proposal version history.




Recommended Action Items


Copied from call notes 5/22/2014: Alternative 1: Deprecate OBR-13 in favor of OBX/OBR, including fasting status

Alternative 2: Allow OBR-13, but allow only 1 meaning for OBR-13 – preferably for fasting status – Allow repeats, but include guidance language that a repeat of OBR-13 cannot yield a second meaning, S&I LOI recommends this option

o If we accept this, can we wait for v2.9, or do we need to request a V2.8.2

Motion to accept proposal with Alternative Two with understanding that OBR-13 may be deprecated in the future once we have more experience with OBR-13. Ken McCaslin, Diego Lopez

§ What about OBX/PID? – this proposal does NOT include support for an OBX under PID

§ For the OMC sections- did we add the clarification, that it is in the M08 message? - YES

§ Allowing use of OBR-13 does not preclude the use of AOEs? - Correct. For fasting status, if folks want to use OBR-13 this should be communicated in OMC-6.

Against: 0; Abstain: 3; In Favor: 12