This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "OO CR137-760 - Table 0078 Updates"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:OO Open V2.9 Change Requests]]
+
[[Category:OO Open V2.8.2 Change Requests]]
 
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page.
 
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page.
  

Revision as of 16:57, 11 July 2014

Return to OO Change Requests page.

Submitted by: Riki Merrick Revision date: <<Revision Date>>
Submitted date: 31 July 2013 Change request ID: OO CR137-760
Standard/IG: Standard Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>>

Issue

See File:OO CR 137-760.doc for problem definition and proposal.

Recommendation

Rationale

Discussion

After review of the newly published v2.8 we found 2 more concepts listed in table 0078: OBX - Interpretation qualifiers in separate OBX segments - Came from CR-638 (GE, Harry Solomon - IHE) Per the CR documentation on the wiki this proposal was withdrawn, so should not have been added to table, correct? See: http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=OO_CR021-638_Result_Status_Codes

HM - Hold for Medical Review - Came from CR-635 (Quest, Ken McCaslin) Per the CR documentation on the wiki, this was adopted See: http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=OO_CR018-635_Abnormal_Flag_Vocabulary

If we can get a definition for this concept we can add to the v2.9 table - Rationale listed was: The new code is intended to indicate that the laboratory is deferring interpretation of the result pending input from the ordering provider, due to circumstances with the patient that cause the typical normal ranges to not apply. The result will also not be placed in the patient record pending the ordering provider’s interpretation. - can this be generalized beyond lab, or does it apply ONLY to lab?

Recommended Action Items

Resolution