This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "OO CR050-678 Segment Group End"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) |
Frankoemig (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
**Agreed with explicit declaration required in message structure. | **Agreed with explicit declaration required in message structure. | ||
**Will review with OO and then circle back with feedback. | **Will review with OO and then circle back with feedback. | ||
| + | *20-Apr-2011 (FO) | ||
| + | **reviewed proposal as of 24-Mar-2011 | ||
| + | **seems to work | ||
| + | **although the original intent was to use it for all groups | ||
| + | **this way it is just introduced for this specific problem | ||
Revision as of 06:50, 21 April 2011
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Frank Oemig | Revision date: <<Date>> |
| Submitted date: December 21, 2010 | Change request ID: OO CR050 |
| Standard/IG: 2.8 Standard | Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>> |
Contents
Issue
See 2.8 change request File:OO CR050-678.doc for problem definition and proposal.
Recommendation
Rationale
Discussion
- 13-Jan-2011
- Suggestion to change to SGB
- Either mandatory in group, or other suggestion to move to Chapter 2 (akin to ADD, DSC segment use).
- Add more clarifying language.
- Motion to accept proposal as amended. Andrzej Knafel, Ken McCaslin.
- Against: 0; Abstain: 0; In Favor: 5
- Will move forward to Chapter 2 chairs.
- 7-Mar-2011
- Reviewed in I&M.
- General agreement on concept.
- Suggest to have both header and trailer segment as a new order may follow.
- Suggest to adjust name to SGH and SGT.
- Agreed with explicit declaration required in message structure.
- Will review with OO and then circle back with feedback.
- 20-Apr-2011 (FO)
- reviewed proposal as of 24-Mar-2011
- seems to work
- although the original intent was to use it for all groups
- this way it is just introduced for this specific problem
