Difference between revisions of "OO CR-807 - Limited Coverage Policy"
m (→Issue) |
|||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | [[Category:OO Accepted V2.8.2 Change Requests]] | |
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Based on a service providers catelog or Directory of Services payers may not reimburse for those services based on Diagnosis and CPT coding. This is to add a message and segments to define Limited Coverage and Permissible coverage policy requirements based on Payer. The message will be from the service provider based on their Universal Service Identifiers and will defined by Payer and the diagnosis and CPT codes, either what is permissible or what will not be reimbursed. | Based on a service providers catelog or Directory of Services payers may not reimburse for those services based on Diagnosis and CPT coding. This is to add a message and segments to define Limited Coverage and Permissible coverage policy requirements based on Payer. The message will be from the service provider based on their Universal Service Identifiers and will defined by Payer and the diagnosis and CPT codes, either what is permissible or what will not be reimbursed. | ||
| − | The problem definition and proposal can be found in the [http://www.hl7.org/memonly/dbtracker/attach/807.docx attached document]. | + | The problem definition and (originial) proposal can be found in the [http://www.hl7.org/memonly/dbtracker/attach/807.docx attached document]. See file reference below for current version. |
| + | |||
| + | 2014-08-26 eDOS WG reviewed with a few minor edits in the proposal (typos); '''updated version''' at: [[Image:807.docx]] | ||
== Recommendation == | == Recommendation == | ||
| Line 32: | Line 34: | ||
== Resolution == | == Resolution == | ||
| + | OO Call 9/4/2014: | ||
| + | edited during the call, track changes on | ||
| + | • Motion to request this to be a v2.8.2 proposal and accept as modified Ken McCaslin, Eric Haas | ||
| + | • further discussion: | ||
| + | o Need to still make the changes to MCP-2 text portion | ||
| + | o Since this includes IN4 segment need to get formal FM WG approval – or rename the segment – FM WG is meeting tomorrow, will see, if this can be on agenda | ||
| + | o So modify to include: subject to FM WG approval | ||
| + | o Why was this not part of original eDOS? | ||
| + | When ACLA was working on eDOS, there was worry, that including financial information in eDOS could send the wrong image about laboratories, BUT this is being developed through the S&I Framework eDOS WG so think that is ok in this venue | ||
| + | Modified motion for the vote: Motion to request this to be a v2.8.2 proposal and accept as modified subject to FM WG review | ||
| + | Abstain: 4, Against: 1 in favor: 8 | ||
| + | |||
| + | WGM 9/17/2014: Was approved by eDOS, OO and FM, because it has an IN4 segment in it. Question about where to publish that segment – so consideration is to rename this segment for Payor Plan Masterfile segment to be able to publish it in the same chapter. Motion to open the CR for this discussion, Freida Hall, David Burgess, no further against:0, abstain: 0, in favor 8 | ||
| + | Looking for a new segment name: INM – INsurance Masterfile = IMN, or PayorMasterfile1 – PM1 | ||
| + | Motion to rename IN4 to PM1 and rename the segment to Payor Masterfile Segment Freida Hall, Francois Macary, no further discussion, against: 0, abstain: 0, in favor: 8 | ||
Latest revision as of 12:37, 3 October 2014
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Ken McCaslin - on behalf of ACLA | Revision date: <<Revision Date>> |
| Submitted date: 7 August 2014 | Change request ID: OO CR807 |
| Standard/IG: Standard | Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>> |
Issue
The proposal -
Based on a service providers catelog or Directory of Services payers may not reimburse for those services based on Diagnosis and CPT coding. This is to add a message and segments to define Limited Coverage and Permissible coverage policy requirements based on Payer. The message will be from the service provider based on their Universal Service Identifiers and will defined by Payer and the diagnosis and CPT codes, either what is permissible or what will not be reimbursed.
The problem definition and (originial) proposal can be found in the attached document. See file reference below for current version.
2014-08-26 eDOS WG reviewed with a few minor edits in the proposal (typos); updated version at: File:807.docx
Recommendation
The eDOS Work Group might be interested in moving this into v2.8.2.
Rationale
Discussion
Recommended Action Items
Resolution
OO Call 9/4/2014: edited during the call, track changes on • Motion to request this to be a v2.8.2 proposal and accept as modified Ken McCaslin, Eric Haas • further discussion: o Need to still make the changes to MCP-2 text portion o Since this includes IN4 segment need to get formal FM WG approval – or rename the segment – FM WG is meeting tomorrow, will see, if this can be on agenda o So modify to include: subject to FM WG approval o Why was this not part of original eDOS? When ACLA was working on eDOS, there was worry, that including financial information in eDOS could send the wrong image about laboratories, BUT this is being developed through the S&I Framework eDOS WG so think that is ok in this venue Modified motion for the vote: Motion to request this to be a v2.8.2 proposal and accept as modified subject to FM WG review Abstain: 4, Against: 1 in favor: 8
WGM 9/17/2014: Was approved by eDOS, OO and FM, because it has an IN4 segment in it. Question about where to publish that segment – so consideration is to rename this segment for Payor Plan Masterfile segment to be able to publish it in the same chapter. Motion to open the CR for this discussion, Freida Hall, David Burgess, no further against:0, abstain: 0, in favor 8 Looking for a new segment name: INM – INsurance Masterfile = IMN, or PayorMasterfile1 – PM1 Motion to rename IN4 to PM1 and rename the segment to Payor Masterfile Segment Freida Hall, Francois Macary, no further discussion, against: 0, abstain: 0, in favor: 8
