This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Negation Requirements Project Minutes 16 August 2017"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " <!-- LOOK FOR THE APPROPRIATE SECTION ****** TO ENTER INFORMATION--> Back to Negation Minutes ==Minutes== ===Meeting Information=== {|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspaci...")
 
Line 133: Line 133:
 
# Examples.  
 
# Examples.  
 
## Review of CDA examples shows some inconsistency
 
## Review of CDA examples shows some inconsistency
### no allergy: concern act (CONC) is active; obs negated
+
### no allergy: concern act (CONC) is active; contains negated observation of allergy
### no concerns: concern act (loinc concern) negated, active; no obs
+
### no concerns: concern act (loinc concern) negated, active; no observation
 
## Is this appropriate to requirements or is there a way to align them?
 
## Is this appropriate to requirements or is there a way to align them?
 
## Perhaps this is a key principle to discover: how to evaluate appropriate balance of specificity & consistency
 
## Perhaps this is a key principle to discover: how to evaluate appropriate balance of specificity & consistency
Line 140: Line 140:
 
#### CDA examples, FHIR examples?
 
#### CDA examples, FHIR examples?
 
# Next time: San Diego Agenda, including plan for January ballot.
 
# Next time: San Diego Agenda, including plan for January ballot.
 
 
  
 
===Meeting Outcomes===
 
===Meeting Outcomes===

Revision as of 15:03, 16 August 2017

Back to Negation Minutes

Minutes

Meeting Information

HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes

Location: PC call line

Date: 2017-08-16
Time: 11:00-12:00 ET
Facilitator Jay Lyle Note taker(s) Jay Lyle
Attendee Name Affiliation


y Jay Lyle JP Systems
Lisa Nelson
y Rob Hausam
Craig Newman
Rita Pyle
Richard Esmond
Andrew Haslam
Floyd Eisenberg
Susan Barber
Larry McKnight
Galen Mulrooney
Kurt Allen
Jim Case
Juliet Rubini
Hank Mayers

Agenda

Agenda Topics

  1. Agenda review
  2. problem statement
  3. class diagram
  4. examples


Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

  1. Problems: Rob agrees with Craig's issue - microbiology
  2. Diagram: not reviewed. Need to confirm usefulness.
  3. Examples.
    1. Review of CDA examples shows some inconsistency
      1. no allergy: concern act (CONC) is active; contains negated observation of allergy
      2. no concerns: concern act (loinc concern) negated, active; no observation
    2. Is this appropriate to requirements or is there a way to align them?
    3. Perhaps this is a key principle to discover: how to evaluate appropriate balance of specificity & consistency
      1. How to get information on drivers, which may be case-specific
        1. CDA examples, FHIR examples?
  4. Next time: San Diego Agenda, including plan for January ballot.

Meeting Outcomes

Actions
  • review Use Cases for completeness, classification for accuracy (all)


Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
  • Continue review of requirements

© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.