This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "MnM SWOT"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Approved by MnM 2018-09-11) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
====Strengths==== | ====Strengths==== | ||
| − | *Active members with strong knowledge of Methodology and its foundations | + | *Active members with strong knowledge of V3 and FHIR Methodology and its foundations |
*Active members with a passion for a functional methodology | *Active members with a passion for a functional methodology | ||
*Solid foundation in RIM and Methodology | *Solid foundation in RIM and Methodology | ||
| − | * | + | *Responsibility for FHIR methodology and data types ensures ongoing relevance |
====Weaknesses==== | ====Weaknesses==== | ||
*Core members have other primary interests and/or responsibilities within HL7 | *Core members have other primary interests and/or responsibilities within HL7 | ||
| − | *Difficulty getting all (or even most) facilitators together to form true consensus | + | *Difficulty getting all (or even most) facilitators (and sometimes even co-chairs) together to form true consensus |
*Lack of bandwidth to train new participants and Facilitators | *Lack of bandwidth to train new participants and Facilitators | ||
*Lack of new participants to pass on the methodology | *Lack of new participants to pass on the methodology | ||
*Difficult to track, monitor and maintain active communication with the organizations breadth of Work Groups and projects | *Difficult to track, monitor and maintain active communication with the organizations breadth of Work Groups and projects | ||
| + | *V3 interest has faded to almost nothing | ||
====Opportunities==== | ====Opportunities==== | ||
| − | *Chance to | + | *Potential to work on RIM as an ontology or other RIM migration |
| − | *Chance to | + | *Chance to get more involved in the mapping space |
| − | * | + | *Chance to work with Vocabulary on UTG |
| + | *Chance to more formally document FHIR methodology/guidance/best practices, particularly in the IG space | ||
| + | *Possible methodology in new technical areas - AI, bulk data, ?? | ||
====Threats==== | ====Threats==== | ||
| − | * | + | *Running out of things to do: |
| − | * | + | **Primary original purpose for MnM (V3 methodology) will soon be irrelevant |
| − | * | + | **FHIR Data types being normative means primary work item to date will significantly fade in volume |
| + | *MnM isn't perceived as relevant, so MnM advice/feedback isn't solicited | ||
| + | *Unclear where to transition MnM's V3 & methodology responsibilities if we disband | ||
Latest revision as of 20:36, 11 September 2018
SWOT
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats for Modeling and Methodology Work Group (MnM)
Strengths
- Active members with strong knowledge of V3 and FHIR Methodology and its foundations
- Active members with a passion for a functional methodology
- Solid foundation in RIM and Methodology
- Responsibility for FHIR methodology and data types ensures ongoing relevance
Weaknesses
- Core members have other primary interests and/or responsibilities within HL7
- Difficulty getting all (or even most) facilitators (and sometimes even co-chairs) together to form true consensus
- Lack of bandwidth to train new participants and Facilitators
- Lack of new participants to pass on the methodology
- Difficult to track, monitor and maintain active communication with the organizations breadth of Work Groups and projects
- V3 interest has faded to almost nothing
Opportunities
- Potential to work on RIM as an ontology or other RIM migration
- Chance to get more involved in the mapping space
- Chance to work with Vocabulary on UTG
- Chance to more formally document FHIR methodology/guidance/best practices, particularly in the IG space
- Possible methodology in new technical areas - AI, bulk data, ??
Threats
- Running out of things to do:
- Primary original purpose for MnM (V3 methodology) will soon be irrelevant
- FHIR Data types being normative means primary work item to date will significantly fade in volume
- MnM isn't perceived as relevant, so MnM advice/feedback isn't solicited
- Unclear where to transition MnM's V3 & methodology responsibilities if we disband
