This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "MnM SWOT"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*Chance to improve collaboration with I&M and Vocabulary | *Chance to improve collaboration with I&M and Vocabulary | ||
*Change to re-think and refactor artifacts and methodology as part of SAIF work | *Change to re-think and refactor artifacts and methodology as part of SAIF work | ||
+ | *Engage w/ OMG and others to seek incorporation of key methodology constructs (design by constraint, terminology binding, etc.) into "standard" methodologies such as UML. | ||
====Threats==== | ====Threats==== | ||
*Losing credibility due to inability to respond to key issues in timely fashion | *Losing credibility due to inability to respond to key issues in timely fashion | ||
*Chance that reorganization of responsibilities of core committees might disrupt current goals and activities | *Chance that reorganization of responsibilities of core committees might disrupt current goals and activities |
Revision as of 18:37, 17 May 2011
SWOT
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats for Modeling and Methodology Work Group (MnM)
Strengths
- Active members with strong knowledge of Methodology and its foundations
- Active members with a passion for a functional methodology
- Solid foundation in RIM and Methodology
- The HL7 membership trusts the work group's to lead
Weaknesses
- Inadequate documentation of some of Methodology & Processes
- Tends to be reactive, rather than pro-active on issues relating to methodology
- Too few active participants
- Lack of bandwidth to train new participants and Facilitators
Opportunities
- Opening for outreach and collaboration with "non-messaging" V3
- Need for Harmonization of RIM, Vocabulary, etc. in SDO summits
- Chance to improve collaboration with I&M and Vocabulary
- Change to re-think and refactor artifacts and methodology as part of SAIF work
- Engage w/ OMG and others to seek incorporation of key methodology constructs (design by constraint, terminology binding, etc.) into "standard" methodologies such as UML.
Threats
- Losing credibility due to inability to respond to key issues in timely fashion
- Chance that reorganization of responsibilities of core committees might disrupt current goals and activities