This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "MnM SWOT"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: ===SWOT=== ====Strengths==== *Active members with strong knowledge of Methodology and its foundations *Active members with a passion for a functional methodology *Solid foundation in RIM a...) |
(→SWOT) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===SWOT=== | ===SWOT=== | ||
| + | Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats for Modeling and Methodology Work Group (MnM) | ||
====Strengths==== | ====Strengths==== | ||
*Active members with strong knowledge of Methodology and its foundations | *Active members with strong knowledge of Methodology and its foundations | ||
Revision as of 14:56, 5 September 2008
SWOT
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats for Modeling and Methodology Work Group (MnM)
Strengths
- Active members with strong knowledge of Methodology and its foundations
- Active members with a passion for a functional methodology
- Solid foundation in RIM and Methodology
- The HL7 membership trusts the work groups to lead
Weaknesses
- Inadequate documentation of some of Methodology & Processes and tendency to react to methodology needs rather than lead
- Too few active participants
- Lack of bandwidth to train new participants and Facilitators
Opportunities
- Opening for outreach and collaboration with "non-messaging" V3
- Need for Harmonization of Vocabulary, etc. in SDO summits
- (JWGCDM-redux)
- Chance to improve collaboration with I&M and Vocabulary
Threats
- Losing credibility due to inability to respond to key issues in timely fashion
- Chance that reorganization of responsibilities of core committees might disrupt current goals and activities
