This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

MnM Minutes WGM 201010 Cambridge

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sunday,Oct 3, 2010 - Q3

Agenda

  • Agenda Topics Review
  • Hot Topics Triage

Minutes

PRESENT: Woody Beeler, Lorraine Constable, John Koisch, Bruce McKinnon, Austin Kreisler, Mead Walker, Gregg Seppala, Andy Stechishin, Jean Duteau, Kathleen Connor, Brian Pech, Anil Luthra, Kevin Coonan, Rene Spronk, Sarah Gaunt, Grahame Grieve, David O'Driscoll, David Rowed, Michael Steine, Anita Walden

Agenda Discussion

  • Hot Topics to discuss
    • MnM Involvement with SAIF, including BF
    • TemplateId on the Query Response
    • Behavioural Framework (Join OO)
    • Versioning
    • Attribute Context Conduction
    • Role Link
    • CMET status + DCM concerns

No Tue Q2 and no Wed Q2.

Action Items

  • ACTION: Grahame will update the WGM schedule and email it to the list.

Monday, October 4, 2010 - Q3

Agenda

  • MIF2 Reconcilliation

Attendees

NO QUORUM

Monday, October 6, 2010 - Q4

Agenda

  • Core Principles Reconcilliation

Attendees

NO QUORUM

Tuesday, October 7, 2010 - Q1

Attendees

  • Grahame Grieve, Woody Beeler, Jean Duteau

Agenda

  • Core Principles Reconciliation

Minutes

Core Principles Reconciliation

  • Worked through the Negatives assigned to Grahame and some of the Negatives assigned to Woody.
  • Brought Lloyd in to discuss two comments that needed in-person discussion.

Meeting adjourned

Tuesday, October 7, 2010 - Q3

Agenda

  • Hot Topics - "MnM Involvement with SAIF, including BF"

Attendees

  • Woody Beeler, Xia Jing, John Koisch, Lorraine Constable, Adri Burggraaff, Li Zhou, Alexander Henket, Patrick Loyd

Minutes

Tuesday, October 7, 2010 - Q4

Agenda

  • Hot Topics - "Query Mechanism which specifies templates for the response"
  • Update on MIF-to-UML work at OMG

Attendees

  • Woody Beeler, Alexander Henket, Patrick Loyd, Jean Duteau, Brian Pech, Rik Smithies, Robert Worden, Rene Spronk, Lorraine Constable

Minutes

Discussion of Query Mechanism to specify a template for the response

We discussed the use cases for this requirement. We discussed the rejected alternatives. -interaction per query -make the new template ID a parameter

  • This is revising a harmonization proposal "Add QuerySpec.responseTemplateid attribute" (also on the Wiki)
    • There was a comment that we do not have a real implementation of "Query By Example" so the argument against ParameterItem due to QBE requirements was not deemed sufficient.
    • The RIM definition of ParameterItem does not preclude sending the templateID as a parameter item.
    • This seems akin to the QueryLimit information.
    • It was deemed that this proposal was the easiest
    • Currently the proposal is suggesting all templates must be satisfied. There appears to be a use case for "one of" the templates to be satisfied.
    • What should the datatype be? In R1, SET<II>, in R2, QSET<II>. ACTION: Determine what the datatype should be.
    • It appears that we could "undeprecate" the ResponseElementGroupId parameter that had been deprecated.

ACTION: InM will advance the harmonization proposal for the next harmonization meeting.

Update on MIF-to-UML work at OMG

Jean presented a summary of his lunchtime conversation with Robert Lario. Robert will be producing a document that summarizes the analysis. He has requested some volunteer hours to help produce the report. The next step after the report appears to be to build a super-profile.

Wednesday, October 6, 2010 - Q1

Agenda

  • Hosting Joint with Vocabulary - MIF Reconciliation

Attendees

Minutes

Thursday, October 7, 2010 - Q1

Agenda

  • Hot Topics - "Versioning"

Attendees

Minutes

Thursday, October 7, 2010 - Q2

Agenda

  • Hot Topics - "Attribute Conduction"

Attendees

Rik Smithies, Austin Kreisler, Rene Spronk, Jean Duteau, Marc Koehn, Debbie Bogert

Minutes

Discussion of Context Conduction for Attributes

We considered Austin's original proposal. Given Victor's input on the Hot topic, we decided on the following:

  • we would create a new "Block All Attribute Conduction" attribute of type BN on ActRelationship
  • The "conductible" property part of Austin's proposal would remain the same
  • We also need to document in Core Principles that attributes with conductible set to true will effectively conduct as old-style OP, i.e. propagating, override.

Alternatives:

  • "Block All Conduction" vs "Block All Attribute Conduction"
    • we already have the ability to block the other things that conduct, so we decided to make this just attributes for consistency
  • Attributes do not conduct at all

ACTION: Austin will take this information and craft a new version of the proposal.

Thursday, October 7, 2010 - Facilitator's Roundtable

Agenda

  • Publishing Calendar
  • Workgroup Updates
  • MnM Week Update

Attendees

Woody Beeler (MnM), Jean Duteau (MnM, Pharmacy), Hugh Glover (Medication), Julie James (Pharmacy Vocab), Bob Dolin (StructDoc), Patrick Loyd (O&O, InM, ClinicalStatement), Andy Stechishin (Publishing, Tooling, ITS), John Koisch (ArB), Grahame Grieve (MnM), Austin Kreisler (O&O, StructDoc, PHER), Gregg Seppala (PatientAdmin), Gunther Schadow (CPM, RCRIM), Kevin Coonan (Patient Care), Rene Spronk (RIMBAA), Bev White (Vocab)

Minutes

Publishing Calendar

  • HARMONIZATION DATES
    • November 9-12, 2010 - Harmonization Meeting
  • Proposed for 2011
    • March 15-18, 2011
    • July 5-8, 2011
    • November 15-18, 2011

MOTION: Jean/Patrick 13/0/0

Workgroup Updates

VOCABULARY

  • Problems with Ed Summit due to resource conflicts
  • MOTION: Move Harmonization to the 11-12,18-19 with the same current deadline dates. Bev/Patrick, 13/0/0

PATIENT ADMINISTRATION

  • Canada is bringing interdependent registries forward.
  • This appears to bring some common design patterns to the forefront.

PHER

  • No proposals or new ballot information.

STRUCT DOC

  • Some harm proposals will be coming forward.
  • There was a question about Datatypes R2. With the limited number of topics that are going to ballot, Woody has put forward that the January ballot will be Datatypes R2.

ITS

  • hData will be going to DSTU ballot this cycle.
  • The Neutral Mapping project is going forward. It does not meet Lloyd's desire as being the glue between SAIF layers, but there is value in the project.
  • MDMI presentation was tremendously disappointing.

ArB

  • There was a problem brought to the attention of the ArB about the balloting of hData.
  • ArB has asked the ITS group to explain why they are balloting hData.
  • Grahame noted that HL7 allows things to get to ballot and at the ballot is where things are governed.
  • The Project Scope Statement can be reviewed to determine if the scope of the project is different from what is being balloted.

O&O

  • Dietetics was brought forward as well as some models from Clinical Genomics
  • The rest of the meeting was about the Behavioural Model

MnM Week Update

Friday, October 8, 2010 - Q1

Agenda

  • Hot Topics - "Role Link"
  • Planning and Schedule for Sydney
  • CMET Status
  • DCM Concerns

Attendees

Minutes