This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

MnM Minutes CC 20110302

From HL7Wiki
Revision as of 00:04, 17 February 2011 by Gwbeeler (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)

Logistics

Join GoToMeeting at

https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/701832453
Meeting ID: 701-832-453

Return to MnM Minutes

Agenda

Approve Agenda and Minutes Prior Meeting on 02/23

Reconcile Core Principles Negative Votes

Proposed actions in Spread sheet on Ballot Desktop

Document Being Reconciled

As of 2/23 Conference call, the following Three negatives remain. Lloyd McKenzie and Grahame Grieve will collaborate to address these:

Item 33 [at 3/3.4.1.1] (M Neg-Mi) 0/0/0

Voter Comment

I have *no clue* what this is saying.

Item 34 [at 3/3.4.1.1] (M Neg-Mi) 0/0/0

Voter Comment

Not true. The association end names (traversal names) are determined separately for each class in the choice hierarchy. While some association end names may indeed be constructed using the name of the target class, this has nothing to do with choices.

Item 35 [at 3/3.4.1.1] (M Neg-Mi) 0/0/0

Voter Comment

One of the defining features of a LIM is that it is never used as an expressed model. If it's used as an expressed model, then it's a SIM. If we're not happy with usage being a characteristic of whether something is a LIM or not, then we should just say that LIMs have incomplete classes and accept that templates might be LIMs or SIMs.

Reconcile Core Principles Negative Votes

There are 28 such items by current count.

Review Action Items For MnM

Note the following list, and amend the list to assign selected items:

Adjournment