MnM Minutes CC 20110209

M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)

Return to MnM Minutes

Agenda

• Approve Agenda and Minutes Prior Meeting on Feb 2
• Approve WGM MInutes from Sydney
• Core Principles Ballot Reconciliation

Attendees

Stechishin, Pech, Beeler, Seppala, Savage

Approve Agenda and Minutes Prior Meeting on Feb 2

Agenda approved - Andy/Rob unanimous

February 2 minutes approved - Gregg/Brian Unanimous

Approve WGM MInutes from Sydney

Sydney WGM minutes approved - Andy/Rob - 3-0-1

Core Principles Ballot Reconciliation

Sources

Proposed actions were found in Spread sheet on Ballot Desktop

Document Being Reconciled

Process

Proposed "dispositions" and and "disposition comments" were provided in the source spread sheet. In a few cases, the "disposition comment" was amended before the motion and vote.

For a handful of items that duplicated other line items, the duplication was noted, and the "disposition" and "vote" were copied from the item that had previously been voted upon.

Voting on "Persuasive" and "Persuasive with Mod" actions

Items: 8,9,10,11 -- Andy Stechishin/Rob Savage 4-0-0

Items: 12, 17,19, 20, 114 -- Andy Stechishin/Rob Savage 4-0-0

Items: 116, 117,124 Andy Stechishin/Brian Pech 4-0-0

Items: 144, 145, 198 Rob Savage/Andy Stechishin 4-0-0

Voting on "Not Persuasive" and "Not Persuasive with Mod" actions

Item: 13 Brian Pech/Rob Savage 4-0-0

Item: 21 Rob Savage/Andy Stechishin 4-0-0

Item: 180 Andy Stechishin/Rob Savage 4-0-0

Next Reconciliation Call

On the next call, we will consider remaining Negatives, many of which need input from McKenzie and Grieve

Adjournment

After 42 minutes.

Dispositions adopted in today's conference call

In sequence, the following actions were voted today.

Item 8 (B Neg-Mi) 4/0/0

Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Persuasive with mod"

Will seek your help in expressing this SAIFly

Item 9 (B Neg-Mi) 4/0/0

Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Persuasive with mod"

Intent is RIM/Vocab/DT. Will attempt to clarify

Item 12 (B Neg-Mi) 4/0/0

Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Persuasive with mod"

Will attempt to fix these and align them with the relevant content for the RIM which has also been corrected.

. Also, I do not believe "Requirements for RIM should be Normative for Core Principles

Item 13 (B Neg-Mi) 4/0/0

Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Not persuasive with mod"

Current "rules" say that only WGs with an item under current ballot, or a project for future ballot have a vote in Harmonization. I agree that all should review, but NOT all count for voting. Will seek to record this.

Item 17 (B M Neg-Mi) 4/0/0

Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Persuasive"

Use your wording

Item 19 (B M Neg-Mi) 4/0/0

Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Persuasive"

Drop bullet

Item 20 (B M Neg-Mi) 4/0/0

Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Persuasive"

Combine to bullets to read "The names of all attributes and associations within a class must be unique within the single attribute-association namespace defined by that class.

Item 21 (B M Neg-Mj) 4/0/0

Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Not persuasive with mod"

Term was based on HDF and perceived expectation that this will be the SAIF name, too.

We are ping-ponging this one. I believe I had negative vote the other way a couple of cycles back.

Accept the "SAIF" term only.

Item 114 (B Neg-Mi) 4/0/0

Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Persuasive"

use word "ancestor

Item 116 (B Neg-Mi) 4/0/0

Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Persuasive with mod"

Change to: "After reviewing propposals to correct or replace the prior mechanism, that mechanism was deprecated in March 2010, and the mechanism described here was adopted for use with all future models.

Item 117 (B Neg-Mi) 4/0/0

Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Persuasive with mod"

How about: "In this example, when using the current (new) context control structure, one can accomplish the equivalent of a participation "override" (from the prior context control structure) by blocking conduction of the "PRF" participation code in the ActRelationship leading to the descendant, and assigning a new performer Participation to the descendant.

Item 124 (M Neg-Mi) 4/0/0

Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Persuasive"

Use your proposed text.

Item 144 (M Neg-Mi) 4/0/0

Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Persuasive with mod"

Actual correction should read: "The type is a tuple: the name of the model, and the name of the type/constraint definition in the mode.

Item 145 (M Neg-Mi) 4/0/0

Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Persuasive with mod"

Propose: (a) change title to "Kinds of Type Models for Classes", and (b) change sentence to "As a consequence, there are three kinds of type models applicable to classes - ecpressed models, implied models, and applied models - as:

Item 180 (B Neg-Mi) 4/0/0

Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Not persuasive"

No. Thius is defining the context that MIGHT be conducted. This whole section is about vocabulary-based as stated in the sentence that preceds the list.

Item 198 (B Neg-Mi) 4/0/0

Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Persuasive with mod"

See Item 8. BUT what is the embedded word doc? It seems to apply to something else.

Item 199 (B Neg-Mi) 4/0/0

Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Persuasive with mod"

Duplicate to Item 9

Item 202 (B Neg-Mi) 4/0/0

Disposition & Disposition Comment - "Not persuasive with mod"

Duplicates item 13 above.