This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20090619"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
*2) '''MOTION:''' Allow the RIM Harmonization proposals to be submitted on June 20-21 - Lloyd/Andy
 
*2) '''MOTION:''' Allow the RIM Harmonization proposals to be submitted on June 20-21 - Lloyd/Andy
 
*3) Graphical Format, i.e Static Model Representation
 
*3) Graphical Format, i.e Static Model Representation
-There was a discussion of the BNF
+
**There was a discussion of the BNF
-is this in Tooling's domain or MnM's?
+
***is this in Tooling's domain or MnM's?
-Discussion of different graphical views of a model
+
**Discussion of different graphical views of a model
-The question became "What do we need to expose in the diagram?"
+
***The question became "What do we need to expose in the diagram?"
-Lloyd raised the idea of two questions:
+
***Lloyd raised the idea of two questions:
-"What must the tool be capable of displaying?"
+
****"What must the tool be capable of displaying?"
-"Does the tool need to support profiles of what is displayed?"
+
****"Does the tool need to support profiles of what is displayed?"

Revision as of 17:19, 19 June 2009

Attendees: Woody, Lloyd, Andy, Austin, Dale, Patrick, Jean, Gregg, Dave Carlson, Norman Daoust

  • 1) Minutes Review with Date change - Andy/Gregg
  • 2) MOTION: Allow the RIM Harmonization proposals to be submitted on June 20-21 - Lloyd/Andy
  • 3) Graphical Format, i.e Static Model Representation
    • There was a discussion of the BNF
      • is this in Tooling's domain or MnM's?
    • Discussion of different graphical views of a model
      • The question became "What do we need to expose in the diagram?"
      • Lloyd raised the idea of two questions:
        • "What must the tool be capable of displaying?"
        • "Does the tool need to support profiles of what is displayed?"