Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20090327"
(New page: =M&M Conference Call Noon Eastern Time (Date above)= ==Attendance== * Lloyd McKenzie * Woody Beeler * Austin Kreisler * Jean-Henri Duteau * Ioana Singureanu * Andy Stechishin * Craig Parke...) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* Gregg Seppala | * Gregg Seppala | ||
* Scott Robertson | * Scott Robertson | ||
| − | + | * Bernard Jackson | |
| + | * Patrick Loyd | ||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
* Harmonization Proposal for Endorsement | * Harmonization Proposal for Endorsement | ||
| − | * Vocabulary | + | * Vocabulary Agenda Time |
* Graphical Representation of RMIMs (continued) | * Graphical Representation of RMIMs (continued) | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
===Harmonization Proposal for Endorsement=== | ===Harmonization Proposal for Endorsement=== | ||
| + | Lloyd suggested that there are problems with being able to create value sets from DedicatedClinicalLocationRoleType since there are multiple codes for single concepts. Woody suggested that some of the codes may need to be deprecated. | ||
| − | ===Vocabulary=== | + | '''Motion:''' Woody/Mead (passed unanimously) - Change the proposal to recommend that concepts from the HIPPA provider taxonomy need to be removed from RoleCode/DedicatedClinicalLocationRoleType where possible. |
| + | |||
| + | ===Vocabulary Agenda Time=== | ||
| + | Vocabulary would like to have more time to meet with MnM in Kyoto. Woody and Craig will work on making the appropriate arrangements. | ||
===Graphical Representation of RMIMs (continued)=== | ===Graphical Representation of RMIMs (continued)=== | ||
| + | Austin posted an informal poll as to which graphical representation people preferred. The results are: | ||
| + | * SMD 17 | ||
| + | * UML 10 | ||
| + | * Other 2 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Woody expressed the need to have enough content to evaluate a design visibly viewable in a graphical representation. He stated that SMD provides much more of that content than UML. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Lloyd explained that while the richness of the HL7 model can be represented in UML, it is difficult to do this without the aid of an additional tooling layer that is HL7 specific. | ||
| + | |||
---- | ---- | ||
[[MnM_Minutes | Return to M&M Minutes List]] | [[MnM_Minutes | Return to M&M Minutes List]] | ||
Revision as of 16:43, 27 March 2009
Contents
M&M Conference Call Noon Eastern Time (Date above)
Attendance
- Lloyd McKenzie
- Woody Beeler
- Austin Kreisler
- Jean-Henri Duteau
- Ioana Singureanu
- Andy Stechishin
- Craig Parker
- Mead Walker
- Brandon Urlich
- Kathleen Connor
- Gregg Seppala
- Scott Robertson
- Bernard Jackson
- Patrick Loyd
Agenda
- Harmonization Proposal for Endorsement
- Vocabulary Agenda Time
- Graphical Representation of RMIMs (continued)
Minutes
Harmonization Proposal for Endorsement
Lloyd suggested that there are problems with being able to create value sets from DedicatedClinicalLocationRoleType since there are multiple codes for single concepts. Woody suggested that some of the codes may need to be deprecated.
Motion: Woody/Mead (passed unanimously) - Change the proposal to recommend that concepts from the HIPPA provider taxonomy need to be removed from RoleCode/DedicatedClinicalLocationRoleType where possible.
Vocabulary Agenda Time
Vocabulary would like to have more time to meet with MnM in Kyoto. Woody and Craig will work on making the appropriate arrangements.
Graphical Representation of RMIMs (continued)
Austin posted an informal poll as to which graphical representation people preferred. The results are:
- SMD 17
- UML 10
- Other 2
Woody expressed the need to have enough content to evaluate a design visibly viewable in a graphical representation. He stated that SMD provides much more of that content than UML.
Lloyd explained that while the richness of the HL7 model can be represented in UML, it is difficult to do this without the aid of an additional tooling layer that is HL7 specific.
