This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20071130"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:2007 MnM Minutes]]
=M&M Conference Call, November 30, 2007=
=M&M Conference Call, November 30, 2007=
(for more detail refer to [ meeting schedule])
(for more detail refer to [ meeting schedule])

Latest revision as of 01:53, 21 May 2010

M&M Conference Call, November 30, 2007

(for more detail refer to meeting schedule)


  • Approval of past minutes
  • Results from harmonization
  • Other TBD


  • Dale Nelson
  • Ioana Singureanu
  • Austin Kreisler
  • Gregg Seppala
  • Lee Coller
  • Craig Parker
  • Woody Beeler


  • Roll call
  • Approved agenda

Agenda was approved: Gregg/Ioana 6-0-0

  • Approve meeting minutes

Minutes were approved for the meetings since October 19th the votes where as follows:
Austin/Ioana 6-0-0
Austin/Lee 7-0-0

HDF Ownership

What is M&M’s position on sharing responsibility for the HDF with Product Services?

Does the M&M still maintain responsibility for balloting, editing?

The HDF contains descriptions of standard artifacts and processes. The MDF declared the standard artifacts with minimal information regarding the development and approval processes. HL7 has explicitly defined its balloting processes in the Bylaws and the co-chair hand-book. That information will be moved in to the GOM under development.

The discussion regarding the ownership of the will be postponed until the ballot period ends. We need more clarity regarding the artifacts and a better level of understanding/consensus regarding the role of process definitons in specifying a methodology for standard desing.

The HDF informative will be available for ballot as an informal document. A walkthrough of the MDF 99 and HDF will be scheduled for next week.

CMET Ballot Discussion

Dale Nelson provied an overview of the ballot and addressed outstanding questions.