This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20071130"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 18: Line 18:
# Roll call
# Roll call
# Approved agenda
# Approved agenda
Agenda was approved
<p>Agenda was approved: Gregg/Ioana 6-0-0</>
Gregg/Ioana 6-0-0
# Approve meeting minutes
# Approve meeting minutes
Minutes were approved
Minutes were approved

Revision as of 21:56, 30 November 2007

M&M Conference Call, November 30, 2007

(for more detail refer to meeting schedule)


  • Approval of past minutes
  • Results from harmonization
  • Other TBD


  • Dale Nelson
  • Ioana Singureanu
  • Austin Kreisler
  • Gregg Seppala
  • Lee Coller
  • Craig Parker
  • Woody Beeler


  1. Roll call
  2. Approved agenda

Agenda was approved: Gregg/Ioana 6-0-0</>

  1. Approve meeting minutes

Minutes were approved October 19th minutes Austin/Ioana 6-0-0 Austin/Lee 7-0-0

  1. HDF Ownership

What is M&M’s position on sharing responsibility for the HDF with Product Services?

Does the M&M still maintain responsibility for balloting, editing?

The HDF contains descriptions of standard artifacts and processes. The MDF declared the standard artifacts with minimal information regarding the development and approval processes. HL7 has explicitly defined its balloting processes in the Bylaws and the co-chair hand-book. That information will be moved in to the GOM under development.

The discussion regarding the ownership of the will be postpones for until after the ballot period. We need more clarity regarding the artifacts and

The HDF informative will be available for ballot as an informal document A walkthrough of the MDF 99 and HDF

  1. CMET Ballot Discussion