Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20071130"
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[Category:2007 MnM Minutes]] | ||
=M&M Conference Call, November 30, 2007= | =M&M Conference Call, November 30, 2007= | ||
(for more detail refer to [http://informatics.mayo.edu/wiki/index.php/MnM_Schedule meeting schedule]) | (for more detail refer to [http://informatics.mayo.edu/wiki/index.php/MnM_Schedule meeting schedule]) | ||
| Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
| − | * Roll call | + | *Roll call |
| − | * Approved agenda<br/> | + | *Approved agenda<br/> |
Agenda was approved: Gregg/Ioana 6-0-0 | Agenda was approved: Gregg/Ioana 6-0-0 | ||
| − | * Approve meeting minutes | + | *Approve meeting minutes |
| − | Minutes were approved | + | Minutes were approved for the meetings since October 19th the votes where as follows:<br/>Austin/Ioana 6-0-0<br/>Austin/Lee 7-0-0 |
| − | October 19th | ||
| − | Austin/Ioana 6-0-0 | ||
| − | Austin/Lee 7-0-0 | ||
====HDF Ownership==== | ====HDF Ownership==== | ||
Latest revision as of 01:53, 21 May 2010
Contents
M&M Conference Call, November 30, 2007
(for more detail refer to meeting schedule)
Agenda
- Approval of past minutes
- Results from harmonization
- Other TBD
Attendees
- Dale Nelson
- Ioana Singureanu
- Austin Kreisler
- Gregg Seppala
- Lee Coller
- Craig Parker
- Woody Beeler
Agenda
- Roll call
- Approved agenda
Agenda was approved: Gregg/Ioana 6-0-0
- Approve meeting minutes
Minutes were approved for the meetings since October 19th the votes where as follows:
Austin/Ioana 6-0-0
Austin/Lee 7-0-0
HDF Ownership
What is M&M’s position on sharing responsibility for the HDF with Product Services?
Does the M&M still maintain responsibility for balloting, editing?
The HDF contains descriptions of standard artifacts and processes. The MDF declared the standard artifacts with minimal information regarding the development and approval processes. HL7 has explicitly defined its balloting processes in the Bylaws and the co-chair hand-book. That information will be moved in to the GOM under development.
The discussion regarding the ownership of the will be postponed until the ballot period ends. We need more clarity regarding the artifacts and a better level of understanding/consensus regarding the role of process definitons in specifying a methodology for standard desing.
The HDF informative will be available for ballot as an informal document. A walkthrough of the MDF 99 and HDF will be scheduled for next week.
CMET Ballot Discussion
Dale Nelson provied an overview of the ballot and addressed outstanding questions.
