This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here

Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20070615"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 33: Line 33:
  
  
====Thursday, June 21st===
+
====Thursday, June 21st====
=====Q1: 9 - 10:30 am EST =====
+
=====(Q1) 9:00-10:30 am EST =====
Inventory of where we are with the dynamic model
+
'''Inventory of where we are with the dynamic model'''
List of know issues
+
*We will try to compile a comprehensive list of needs and issues with the current behavrior modeling.
 +
*UML ''Activity diagrams'' were deemed too complex when they were suggestes as a means for documenting system behavior
  
  
Q2: Services and Application roles
+
=====(Q2) 11:00-12:30 am EST =====
 +
'''Services and Application roles'''
 +
*In this session we will discuss how we relate operations (in interfaces) to interactions.
 +
*Map our interaction concepts to operations and interface
  
How do we relate operations (in interfaces) to  
+
=====(Q3) 1:00-2:30 am EST =====
 +
'''Identify artifacts that will affected by changes to dynamic modeling notation and stype'''
 +
*Documenting and specifying complex interaction patterns
 +
*Look for consensus on the mapping developed in the previous session
  
Q3: Identify artifacts that will affected by the changes.
 
Documenting and specifying complex interaction patterns
 
 activity diagram were deemed too complex
 
  
 +
=====(Q4) 3:30-5:00 am EST =====
 +
'''Complex interaction patterns'''
 +
In this session we will look at some concrete examples
 +
*Service orchestration vs. choreography
 +
**We will not go into the solution for run-time representation of system (e.g. WS-CDL
 +
WS-BPEL). We will focus on the design time representation of interfaces not at the runtime realization.
  
Q4: Complex interaction patterns
 
  
Service orchestration vs. choreography
+
====Thursday, June 22nd====
We will not go into the solution for run-time representation of system (e.g. WS-CDL
+
=====(Q1) 9:00-10:30 am EST =====
WS-BPEL). We will focus on the design time
 
  
 +
Develop approaches to "make it real"
  
Friday AM
+
*The  methodology will be linked back to the product lifecycle management project in the HDT
 +
*Select the notation
  
Q1: Develop approaches to make this real
+
=====(Q2) 11:00-12:30 am EST =====
  
 The  methodology will be linked back to the product lifecycle management project in the HDT
+
'''Open session'''
 Select the notation
 
  
Q2 : Opens session
 
  
  
 +
----
  
 
Minutes by --[[User:Ioana13|Ioana Singureanu]] 14:50, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
 
Minutes by --[[User:Ioana13|Ioana Singureanu]] 14:50, 15 June 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 20:07, 15 June 2007

Attendees

  • Kathleen Connor
  • Lee Coller
  • Ioana Singureanu
  • Lloyd McKenzie
  • Rick Chesnik
  • John Cooper
  • Dale Nelson


Agenda

  • (Lloyd): Administrative topic: Dynamic Model - agenda
  • (Lloyd): Hot Topics: Act Reference - postponed for next WGM because this topic requires input from INM.

Mottion to accept agenda: (No objections)

Administrative Topic: Dynamic Model Discussion

Concerns regarding desinging system behaviors are pervasive in HL7 (from application roles to committee-specific complex interactions to functional service specifications). We have a variety of constructs (Applications Roles, SOA Services, interactions) that require dynamic views and behavioral model constructs such as interfaces, ports, and subsystems.

The agenda for next week must address the needs of a variety of stakeholders:

  • Support for the processes specified in the HDF regarding behavioral models
  • SOA Service support and relating interfaces to Application roles
  • Ability to describe complex interactions for specific domains
  • Leverage the notation and design to describe a variety of in, in/out, output parameters and return types
  • We need to ensure that our design constructs are supported by implementation technologies (e.g. WSDL, WS-CDL, WS-BPEL)

Dynamic Model Agenda (Harmonization Meeting June 21-22, 2007)

The CBC form, as submitted is available on this Wiki and also at http://www.hl7.org/library/committees/mnm/minutes/CBC_INFO_MNM_2007MAY-Complete 20070119.pdf.


Thursday, June 21st

(Q1) 9:00-10:30 am EST

Inventory of where we are with the dynamic model

  • We will try to compile a comprehensive list of needs and issues with the current behavrior modeling.
  • UML Activity diagrams were deemed too complex when they were suggestes as a means for documenting system behavior


(Q2) 11:00-12:30 am EST

Services and Application roles

  • In this session we will discuss how we relate operations (in interfaces) to interactions.
  • Map our interaction concepts to operations and interface
(Q3) 1:00-2:30 am EST
Identify artifacts that will affected by changes to dynamic modeling notation and stype
  • Documenting and specifying complex interaction patterns
  • Look for consensus on the mapping developed in the previous session


(Q4) 3:30-5:00 am EST

Complex interaction patterns In this session we will look at some concrete examples

  • Service orchestration vs. choreography
    • We will not go into the solution for run-time representation of system (e.g. WS-CDL

WS-BPEL). We will focus on the design time representation of interfaces not at the runtime realization.


Thursday, June 22nd

(Q1) 9:00-10:30 am EST

Develop approaches to "make it real"

  • The methodology will be linked back to the product lifecycle management project in the HDT
  • Select the notation
(Q2) 11:00-12:30 am EST

Open session



Minutes by --Ioana Singureanu 14:50, 15 June 2007 (CDT)