This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here

Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20070615"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
===Administrative Topic: [[Dynamic_Model|Dynamic Model]] Discussion ===
 
===Administrative Topic: [[Dynamic_Model|Dynamic Model]] Discussion ===
 +
----
  
----
+
Concerns regarding desinging system behaviors are pervasive in HL7 (from application roles to committee-specific '''complex interactions''' to functional service specifications). We have a variety of constructs (Applications Roles, SOA Services, interactions) that require dynamic views and behavioral model constructs such as interfaces, ports, and subsystems.
  
Desinging system behaviors is pervasive in HL7. We have a variety of constructs (Applications Roles, SOA Services, interactions)
+
The agenda for next week must address the needs of a variety of stakeholders:
There was a general consensus that changing the identifier of an artifact should not be regarded as substantive.  Some felt that a move to non-meaningful identifiers would be useful.
 
  
We need to include the needs:
 
 
*Support for the processes specified in the [http://hdf.wikispaces.com HDF] regarding behavioral models
 
*Support for the processes specified in the [http://hdf.wikispaces.com HDF] regarding behavioral models
 
*SOA Service support and relating interfaces to Application roles
 
*SOA Service support and relating interfaces to Application roles

Revision as of 19:54, 15 June 2007

Attendees

  • Kathleen Connor
  • Lee Coller
  • Ioana Singureanu
  • Lloyd McKenzie
  • Rick Chesnik
  • John Cooper
  • Dale Nelson


Agenda

  • (Lloyd): Administrative topic: Dynamic Model - agenda
  • (Lloyd): Hot Topics: Act Reference - postponed for next WGM because this topic requires input from INM.

Mottion to accept agenda: (No objections)

Administrative Topic: Dynamic Model Discussion


Concerns regarding desinging system behaviors are pervasive in HL7 (from application roles to committee-specific complex interactions to functional service specifications). We have a variety of constructs (Applications Roles, SOA Services, interactions) that require dynamic views and behavioral model constructs such as interfaces, ports, and subsystems.

The agenda for next week must address the needs of a variety of stakeholders:

  • Support for the processes specified in the HDF regarding behavioral models
  • SOA Service support and relating interfaces to Application roles
  • Ability to describe complex interactions for specific domains
  • Leverage the notation and design to describe a variety of in, in/out, output parameters and return types
  • We need to ensure that our design constructs are supported by implementation technologies (e.g. WSDL, WS-CDL, WS-BPEL)

Dynamic Model Agenda (Harmonization Meeting June 21-22, 2007)

The CBC form, as submitted is available on this Wiki and also at http://www.hl7.org/library/committees/mnm/minutes/CBC_INFO_MNM_2007MAY-Complete 20070119.pdf.


Minutes by --Ioana Singureanu 14:50, 15 June 2007 (CDT)