This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here

Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20070615"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 16: Line 16:
 
Mottion to accept agenda: (No objections)
 
Mottion to accept agenda: (No objections)
  
===Administrative Topic: [[Dynamic_Model|Dynamic Model]]===
+
===Administrative Topic: [[Dynamic_Model|Dynamic Model]] Discussion ===
  
Desinging system behaviors is pervasive in HL7.  
+
Desinging system behaviors is pervasive in HL7. We have a variety of constructs (Applications Roles, SOA Services, interactions)
We have a variety of constructs (Applications Roles, SOA Services, interactions)
 
 
There was a general consensus that changing the identifier of an artifact should not be regarded as substantive.  Some felt that a move to non-meaningful identifiers would be useful.
 
There was a general consensus that changing the identifier of an artifact should not be regarded as substantive.  Some felt that a move to non-meaningful identifiers would be useful.
  
We need to separate the maintenance of semantic domains from the maintenance of publishing topics.
+
We need to include the needs:
 
+
*Support HDF processes
Gregg asked when the tooling for publishing could support levels of models as the MIF does?  Woody suggested that this would probably be about 18 months out.
+
*SOA Services
 
+
*Ability to describe complex interactions, a variety of in, in/out, output parameters and return types.
For now, Clinical Decision Support will publish as one domain with two topics.
 
 
 
Agreed to publish an item on the Wiki relative to "[[Domain_Message_Information_Model#What is a domain|What is a Domain]]".  Among the points of agreement were:
 
*All artifacts should derive from some coherent set of knowledge as represented in a single model.  This is a "semantic domain" and is the focus of an HDF DIM.
 
*Publishing should be able to aggregate content from semantic domains into collections that are useful for committees that address multiple semantic domains
 
*Future (18 moths or more out) tooling will allow such publishing, as the MIF allows for such distinctions
 
*Today, several committees are using a single "publishing domain" (really just a package) to publish multiple "semantic domains" each as a topic, including Decision Support, Patient Administration, Common Messages, and Patient Care.
 
*Other committees are maintaining correct semantic domains, such as Pharmacy with Medication and RX. and Lab with OO, LB, SP.
 
*Publishing should determine which pattern is being followed in each of today's "Domains" and should require:
 
**That the style be declared at the front of the domain introduction
 
**That a committee '''not do both'''. That is, in each publishing domain either every topic is a semantic domain or all of the topics are in a single semantic domain. '''Note:''' This may represent an issue for Patient Care.
 
 
 
'''From the Secretary''' If you take issue with this list, please use the new Wiki entry - [[Domain_Message_Information_Model#What is a domain]] to comment.
 
  
 
===Dynamic Model Agenda===
 
===Dynamic Model Agenda===

Revision as of 19:42, 15 June 2007

Attendees

  • Kathleen Connor
  • Lee Coller
  • Ioana Singureanu
  • Lloyd McKenzie
  • Rick Chesnik
  • John Cooper
  • Dale Nelson


Agenda

  • (Lloyd): Administrative topic: Dynamic Model - agenda
  • (Lloyd): Hot Topics: Act Reference - postponed for next WGM because this topic requires input from INM.

Mottion to accept agenda: (No objections)

Administrative Topic: Dynamic Model Discussion

Desinging system behaviors is pervasive in HL7. We have a variety of constructs (Applications Roles, SOA Services, interactions) There was a general consensus that changing the identifier of an artifact should not be regarded as substantive. Some felt that a move to non-meaningful identifiers would be useful.

We need to include the needs:

  • Support HDF processes
  • SOA Services
  • Ability to describe complex interactions, a variety of in, in/out, output parameters and return types.

Dynamic Model Agenda

Edited the form on-screen. Agreed to submit as marked. Beeler will finish and submit the form. Nelson will submit new Project Scope Statement for CMETs Release 6 (those that were in Committee) - The new Project was moved by Nelson, seconded by Beeler and Approved unanimously.

The CBC form, as submitted is available on this Wiki and also at http://www.hl7.org/library/committees/mnm/minutes/CBC_INFO_MNM_2007MAY-Complete 20070119.pdf.


Minutes by Ioana Singureanu ioana13