Difference between revisions of "Location of interactionId on ControlAct"
Rene spronk (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
</td></tr> | </td></tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| − | <td> Sponsored by: INM</td><td> Approval date by committee: | + | <td> Sponsored by: INM</td><td> Approval date by committee: (WITHDRAWN) |
</td></tr> | </td></tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|| INM | || INM | ||
| − | || | + | || '''WITHDRAWN''' (INM Telcon, 20061016) |
|| S | || S | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
Resolution </h2> | Resolution </h2> | ||
| − | [[Category:Harmonization Proposal]] | + | {{INM Finalized Workitem}} |
| + | {{INM Approval|20061016|Motion to WITHDRAW the proposal. It requires a methodology change; needs further clarification from MnM as well as to what the InteractionId signifies}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Discussed Harmonization Proposal]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:12, 6 December 2006
Contents
Harmonization: Location of interactionId in the ControlAct
| Recommendation for HL7 RIM Change | RECOMMENDATION ID: |
| Sponsored by: INM | Approval date by committee: (WITHDRAWN) |
| Revision (# and date): | Date submitted: 14/10/2006 |
| Submitted By: Meena Pillai | |
| PROPOSALNAME: Location of interactionId within ControlAct |
Editing of harmonization proposals prior to a harmonization meeting is restricted to the proposal submitter and the co-chairs of the steward comittee. Other changes will be undone. Please add comments to the "discussion" page associated with this proposal.
Stewards Position
REQUIRED - This table should contain one row for each Steward Committee affected by the recommendation.
| TC | RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL STATUS | AFFECTED ENTITIES OF INTEREST TO TC (responsibility level: S=Steward; I=Interested) |
| INM | WITHDRAWN (INM Telcon, 20061016) | S |
Issue
As part of CFH requirement for batching we need a mechanism to be introduced to allow a Response item to be matched with the correct Query/Request item, this will involve adding a interactionId to the controlact.
Recommendation(s)
There are three possible locations for the interactionId:
1. Within the controlAct itself.
2. Add an act relationship coming off the controlact to an additional act holding the interactionid.
3. Add the interactionId within the typeId attribute.
Rationale
1. The first option would require a change to the RIM and so may seem the least desirable.
2. The second is plausible but may appear to many as somewhat "ugly" in design.
3.The third is less clunky however it could be argued is this the proper use for this attribute?
This is a core requirement that we need to meet and so this decision needs to be made.
Recommended Action Items
- Implement one of the proposed solution.
Discussion
Resolution
This page documents an INM Finalized Workitem, i.e. an issue within scope of the INM Committee that has been finalized, and which (if applicable) has been included in an INM ballot.
