This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Lab Order Template"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* [[OO Behavioral Model Conceptual Specification|Lab Model Conceptual Specification]] (Draft) | * [[OO Behavioral Model Conceptual Specification|Lab Model Conceptual Specification]] (Draft) | ||
− | ==Conceptual Specification To | + | ==Conceptual Specification To Dos== |
* September 2011 WGM | * September 2011 WGM | ||
** Create conceptual datatypes for items needed by conceptual models | ** Create conceptual datatypes for items needed by conceptual models |
Revision as of 04:36, 18 January 2012
Back to Orders & Observations WG main page
Back to OO Projects page
Contents
Scope of Lab Order Template (ID: 587)
To develop a lab order model which meets the needs of lab for v3 and conforms to the composite order model as well.
Documentation
Link to the current document:
Conceptual Specification To Dos
- September 2011 WGM
- Create conceptual datatypes for items needed by conceptual models
- Review model interactions for consistency
- Consider naming conventions for parts of the artifacts, and identifies
- Add the business context text to the use cases, and to the service specifications
- January 2012 WGM
- Review package structure and how to relate composite order model to lab models
- Consider whether need a different package view for publishing purposes from working structure
RMIM To Dos
- Criterion mood to an attribute (preconditions)
- Lab order is a proper subset of composite order (in two weeks)
- composite order missing:
- data enterer.modeCode
- informationrecipient.sequenceNumber, info.rcpt.time
- we are not using consistent sequenceNumber, should be there for all AR and Part where the min cardinality is 1 or higher
- add subject to lab
- lab order need location (yes)
- should composite have reasonCode on placerGroup>?
- update composite obs req and lab obs req for new negation ind
- lab obs request, status must be mandatory
- composite order, why ActDefinition.text (esp. as optional)
- lab prioractrequest, remove code, text, correct spelling 'o'bsolete (lower case 'o')
- does lab need preconidition
Completed RMIM To Dos
- Review 'old' context conduction - DONE (PEL 20110911)
- look at whether PatientorAssigned should still use R-assignedEntity - No change (PEL 20110911)
- bring up to date to the current RIM - DONE (PEL 20110911)
- Replace supporting clinical information CMET with supporting clinical statement
- Replace annotation with annotation cmet
- Add event to fulfillment AR
- replace lab process step with process step cmet