Difference between revisions of "June 26th, Templates Minutes"
MulrooneyG (talk | contribs) |
MulrooneyG (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | Meeting began at 21:00 GMT | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | Grahame motioned that the Template SIG has decided to go ahead with another ballot, and that we go as a DSTU with the expectation that this would be the last ballot as a DSTU. | + | <b>Attendees:</b><br> |
| + | Grahame Grieve<br> | ||
| + | John Koisch<br> | ||
| + | Galen Mulrooney (scribe)<br> | ||
| + | Mark Shafarman (chair)<br> | ||
| + | Ian Townend<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Grahame motioned that the Template SIG has decided to go ahead with another ballot, and that we go as a DSTU with the expectation that this would be the last ballot as a DSTU. IT seconded. For/Against/Abstain: 4/0/0. | ||
Galen will file the Intent to ballot. | Galen will file the Intent to ballot. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Discussed whether perhaps we should drop content regarding Template Registries. JK argued that controversy over this subject is distracting and preventing forward movement on the main body of the documents which is less controversial. GG and MS felt that discussion of Template Registries is indeed germaine as it is useful to inform implementations. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Discussed the issue of incomplete templates. Many of the unresolved negatives deal with this controversial subject, and yet the resolution of this topic is dependent on M&M. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Grahame motioned To deal correctly with the issue with incomplete templates, we need to work with M&M with methodology issues. Rather than delay the current DSTU, we feel comfortable with putting this on a to-do list, and go forward with the DSTU. Grahame will adjust the language in the document accordingly. IT seconded. For/Against/Abstain: 4/0/0. | ||
Revision as of 21:46, 27 June 2007
Meeting began at 21:00 GMT
Attendees:
Grahame Grieve
John Koisch
Galen Mulrooney (scribe)
Mark Shafarman (chair)
Ian Townend
Grahame motioned that the Template SIG has decided to go ahead with another ballot, and that we go as a DSTU with the expectation that this would be the last ballot as a DSTU. IT seconded. For/Against/Abstain: 4/0/0.
Galen will file the Intent to ballot.
Discussed whether perhaps we should drop content regarding Template Registries. JK argued that controversy over this subject is distracting and preventing forward movement on the main body of the documents which is less controversial. GG and MS felt that discussion of Template Registries is indeed germaine as it is useful to inform implementations.
Discussed the issue of incomplete templates. Many of the unresolved negatives deal with this controversial subject, and yet the resolution of this topic is dependent on M&M.
Grahame motioned To deal correctly with the issue with incomplete templates, we need to work with M&M with methodology issues. Rather than delay the current DSTU, we feel comfortable with putting this on a to-do list, and go forward with the DSTU. Grahame will adjust the language in the document accordingly. IT seconded. For/Against/Abstain: 4/0/0.
