June 13 - Work on the Clinical Maturity Model

Attendees: Laura Heermann, Stephen Chu, Elaine Ayers, Joe Quinn, Kate Russell, Rob Hausem

Minutes:

• 1. Last weeks meeting looked at the exisiting maturity model and examined adding the clinical aspects to it
• 2. Discussion this week that we need to have our criteria, tight, concise and impactful.
• 3. The use case requirements
  • a. Accurate in meeting clinical data capture
  • Further notes taken in attached spreadsheet --- NOTE see the 2nd tab in the worksheet. 1st tab are older notes and thoughts on the topic.

• Noted references:
  • http://www.hl7.org/fhir/conformance-rules.html
    • - Conformance with this specification does not provide any guarantee of patient or data safety

- Importance of clinical quality/appropriateness of FHIR design:

- Questions: If it doesn't need to be clinically appropriate at design:

# What mechanisms exist to ensur that "implementers can use it in a way that allows it to be used through clinically appropriate interfaces"?

# Is clinical governance still relevant/required?

# How can clinical confidence be ensured?

FHIR Clinical Maturity Criteria 20170613.2