Difference between revisions of "June 1, 2005"
|Line 42:||Line 42:|
Revision as of 19:09, 1 June 2005
June 1, 2005 Teleconference
Time: 2:00 to 3:00 PM Eastern Time Convert
Phone #: (877)407-0183
Point 5 from May 27 discussion
5) Outline of our deliverables to VCDE workspace:
a) define a vocabulary of missing value reasons that CDEs can draw
from. This is likely to be a hierarchy.
b) develop recommendations to CDE developers. They will need to wrestle
with MV vs. MVR.
One possibility: include MV (e.g., unknown, not specified) in the
And/Or create a linked CDE for the MVR - with values chosen from the
vocabulary in (a).
It seems probable that we will need some way in the caDSR for
linking a CDE with a CDE for the MVR.
c) develop recommendations for the architecture ws on how MV and MVR for
fields are linked in the messaging layer.
David - CDE developer needs to be able to specify MV in field, MVR as separate field or neither
|Draft document for FTF||all||ftf meeting|
|Fill out draft of item 2||Harold Solbrig||1 week|
|Fill out item 4||David Aronow||1 week|
|Discussion of item 3||Jim||1 week|