This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "January 2012 WGM San Antonio"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
'''Jan 16 Monday Q1.'''  
 
'''Jan 16 Monday Q1.'''  
 +
 
Present:
 
Present:
 
Stephen Chu (chairing the meeting), Wlliam Goossen, Michael Tan, Susan Matney, Hugh Leslie, David Rowed, Kai Haitmann, Adel Ghlamallah, Rajan RAI, Meredith Lewis, Jennifer Sisto, Michael van der Zel, Ray Simkus, Kevin Coonan.  
 
Stephen Chu (chairing the meeting), Wlliam Goossen, Michael Tan, Susan Matney, Hugh Leslie, David Rowed, Kai Haitmann, Adel Ghlamallah, Rajan RAI, Meredith Lewis, Jennifer Sisto, Michael van der Zel, Ray Simkus, Kevin Coonan.  
Line 39: Line 40:
 
• Planning of conference phone calls and other work plans: due to time deferred to meeting on Wednesday.
 
• Planning of conference phone calls and other work plans: due to time deferred to meeting on Wednesday.
 
• PC planning of work items and meetings for next WGM: due to time deferred to meeting on Wednesday.
 
• PC planning of work items and meetings for next WGM: due to time deferred to meeting on Wednesday.
 +
 +
'''Jan 16 Monday Q2.'''
 +
 +
Present:
 +
Stephen Chu, Wlliam Goossen (chairing the meeting), Michael Tan, Ray Simkus,
 +
Hugh Leslie, David Rowed, Kai Haitmann,  Meredith Lewis, Robert Dunlop, J.D. Baker.
 +
 +
Q2 – patient care
 +
 +
'''Walk through and discussion of Patient Care wiki on Care Provision'''
 +
 +
What are the core R-MIMs?
 +
 +
1. Care Record
 +
2. Care Transfer (Referral and Promise, 2 R-MIMS altogether)
 +
3. Query of patient record contents relevant to the referral
 +
 +
The topic Query of referral status – early work has been done - does get no further development.
 +
 +
Use of template – can be in form of R-MIM or clinical content as xml; application of constraints to HL7 domain models, CSP, etc; and for creation of validation artefacts.
 +
 +
Confusions on template still exist in HL7 at large. Need to find a “standardized” way how to express template and use them in CDA, Care Record, etc – need to work with Structure Document WG on this issue.
 +
 +
Need also to consider moving away from representing templates as graphic notations and consider use of some form of constraint language (and constraint statements) to express templates. Also need to move away from the entry points for each artifact in D-MIM. Need to look for a better way and harmonize with templates.
 +
 +
Ballot materials – beneficial to add information pertinent to different target audience view points, e.g. clinician, modellers, implementers. Each view point also needs to consider the level of abstraction
 +
 +
Kai to review section on “template” and update contents where necessary
 +
 +
Issue of cascading changes when made in one artefacts need to flow through to other forms of artefacts. Model driven tools to support such changes are lacking.
 +
 +
'''Motion 1:'''
 +
 +
Accept that each patient care template shall have a template ID according to HL7 methodology and this identifier shall be used for every expression of the same template in different formats including MIF, R-MIM, xml, uml, xmi, etc
 +
 +
Kevin (move), Ray (second)
 +
 +
0 against, 1 abstain, 9 support
 +
 +
 +
'''Motion 2:'''
 +
 +
Patient care shall adopt a single approach to template ID generation, and Patient Care shall prescribe the use of template ID.root and template ID.extension for all patient care templates
 +
 +
Tabled for further discussion in another session.
 +
 +
'''Storyboard''' – copy and paste from current ballot materials

Revision as of 02:03, 17 January 2012

Patient Care

patient care work group meeting draft minutes

San Antonio WGM 2012 Jan

Patient Care Workgroup WGM minutes

Jan 16 Monday Q1.

Present: Stephen Chu (chairing the meeting), Wlliam Goossen, Michael Tan, Susan Matney, Hugh Leslie, David Rowed, Kai Haitmann, Adel Ghlamallah, Rajan RAI, Meredith Lewis, Jennifer Sisto, Michael van der Zel, Ray Simkus, Kevin Coonan.

Action items Q1: 1. Short introduction of members present in the meeting.

2. Agenda setting for the week: The agenda was changed. Move to accept the changed agenda v05. 1st Kevin, 2nd Susan vote: 0 opposed, 0 abstain, 13 in favor. This file has been mailed via PC HL7 mailing list.

3. Tooling Micheal van der Zel is our official toolsmith. He asks if PC has requirements for tooling. He will collect these and summarize.

4. Plan for D-MIM / 3 R-MIM ballots

Motion to accept the D-MIM and any combination of Patient Care ‘Care Provision’ R-MIM topic artifacts for ballot content (referral, acceptance, query, and care record) to move to ballot. 1st William 2nd Kevin: vote: 0 no , 0 abstain, 12 in favor Do we need an out of cycle meeting to arrange this? Nictiz is willing to organize this in February 2012. Action item for Michael Tan.

5. WG Mission and Charter on website review The mission and charter was briefly reviewed. Motion to leave the existing PC mission and charter as it currently is. 1st William, 2nd Hugh, vote 0 against, 0 abstain, 12 in favor.

6. 3 year Workplan 2012-2014: 3 year workplan to be discussed and re-approved

The spreadsheet with the PC project was reviewed. Some items have finished, and will be removed. Others are ongoing priorities such as D-MIM and R-MIMs for Care Transfer Topic (refer and promise) Care Record Query Topic, and Care Record Topic.

Motion to accept the changes in Excel workplan 2012 version 0.88. Moved: 1st William 2nd Kai, votes: 0 against, 1 abstain, 12 in favor.

• Business Plan PC: handled as part of the 3 year workplan.

• Planning of conference phone calls and other work plans: due to time deferred to meeting on Wednesday. • PC planning of work items and meetings for next WGM: due to time deferred to meeting on Wednesday.

Jan 16 Monday Q2.

Present: Stephen Chu, Wlliam Goossen (chairing the meeting), Michael Tan, Ray Simkus, Hugh Leslie, David Rowed, Kai Haitmann, Meredith Lewis, Robert Dunlop, J.D. Baker.

Q2 – patient care

Walk through and discussion of Patient Care wiki on Care Provision

What are the core R-MIMs?

1. Care Record 2. Care Transfer (Referral and Promise, 2 R-MIMS altogether) 3. Query of patient record contents relevant to the referral

The topic Query of referral status – early work has been done - does get no further development.

Use of template – can be in form of R-MIM or clinical content as xml; application of constraints to HL7 domain models, CSP, etc; and for creation of validation artefacts.

Confusions on template still exist in HL7 at large. Need to find a “standardized” way how to express template and use them in CDA, Care Record, etc – need to work with Structure Document WG on this issue.

Need also to consider moving away from representing templates as graphic notations and consider use of some form of constraint language (and constraint statements) to express templates. Also need to move away from the entry points for each artifact in D-MIM. Need to look for a better way and harmonize with templates.

Ballot materials – beneficial to add information pertinent to different target audience view points, e.g. clinician, modellers, implementers. Each view point also needs to consider the level of abstraction

Kai to review section on “template” and update contents where necessary

Issue of cascading changes when made in one artefacts need to flow through to other forms of artefacts. Model driven tools to support such changes are lacking.

Motion 1:

Accept that each patient care template shall have a template ID according to HL7 methodology and this identifier shall be used for every expression of the same template in different formats including MIF, R-MIM, xml, uml, xmi, etc

Kevin (move), Ray (second)

0 against, 1 abstain, 9 support


Motion 2:

Patient care shall adopt a single approach to template ID generation, and Patient Care shall prescribe the use of template ID.root and template ID.extension for all patient care templates

Tabled for further discussion in another session.

Storyboard – copy and paste from current ballot materials