Difference between revisions of "Inexact Dates"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{CDA R3 | + | {{CDA R3 Closed Proposals}} |
Return to [[Structured Documents TC|SDTC]] page; Return to [[:category:CDA R3 Formal Proposals|CDA R3 Formal Proposals]] page. | Return to [[Structured Documents TC|SDTC]] page; Return to [[:category:CDA R3 Formal Proposals|CDA R3 Formal Proposals]] page. | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
== Resolution == | == Resolution == | ||
− | + | Feb 9, 2010 SDWG teleconference: If covered in data types R2, will be covered in CDA R3. No need for further SDWG action at this time. abstain: 0; against: 0; in favor: 6. |
Latest revision as of 22:22, 9 February 2010
Return to SDTC page; Return to CDA R3 Formal Proposals page.
See CDA R3 Formal Proposals for instructions on using this form. Failure to adhere to these instructions may result in delays. Editing of formal proposals is restricted to the submitter and SDTC co-chairs. Other changes will be undone. Comments can be captured in the associated discussion page.
(This is a template. Do not edit! Copy and paste source into to a new page)
(An announcement of this proposal must be submitted to the Structured Documents list to be formally submitted.)
Submitted by: Ryan Grapp | Revision date: March 13, 2008 |
Submitted date: March 13, 2008 | Change request ID: <<Change Request ID>> |
Issue
Would like to increase the functionality of effectiveTime or Time to include a concept of inexact dates.
Recommendation
- Approve
Rationale
Discussion
Recommended Action Items
Resolution
Feb 9, 2010 SDWG teleconference: If covered in data types R2, will be covered in CDA R3. No need for further SDWG action at this time. abstain: 0; against: 0; in favor: 6.