This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Improvements to C-CDA Errata, V3 Template Design, Example Taskforce"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Below are the deliverables created to improve to C-CDA Errata, the V3 Template Design, updates to the Example Taskforce *Design and deployment of a new C-CDA errata Process ...")
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
**The attached document includes a suggested migration plan to JIRA
 
**The attached document includes a suggested migration plan to JIRA
 
**The team hosted two requirements sessions to develop and document processes
 
**The team hosted two requirements sessions to develop and document processes
 
+
[https://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/enhanceccdaimpl/docman/Improvements%20to%20C-CDA%20Errata,%20V3%20Template%20Design,%20Example%20Taskforce/C-CDA%20STU%20Comment%20and%20Errata%20Process%20-%20Future%20State.pdf C-CDA STU Comment and Errata Process - Future State]
 
*Future C-CDA templates design guide
 
*Future C-CDA templates design guide
 
**The document linked below is a MS Word template for the development of new C-CDA templates
 
**The document linked below is a MS Word template for the development of new C-CDA templates
 
**The team completed an analysis of UDI vs Advance Directive vs prior companion guides
 
**The team completed an analysis of UDI vs Advance Directive vs prior companion guides
 
+
[https://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/enhanceccdaimpl/docman/Improvements%20to%20C-CDA%20Errata,%20V3%20Template%20Design,%20Example%20Taskforce/Additional%20CDA%20Templates%20Companion%20Guide%20Template.pdf Additional CDA Templates Companion Guide Template]
 
*Example Task Force Updates             
 
*Example Task Force Updates             
 
**The document linked below is a best practices guide for narrative-entry linking.  
 
**The document linked below is a best practices guide for narrative-entry linking.  
The team reviewed this guide with the Example Task Force.
+
**The team reviewed this guide with the Example Task Force.
 
**The Example Task Force Trello board has been reviewed and cleaned up.
 
**The Example Task Force Trello board has been reviewed and cleaned up.
 +
[https://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/enhanceccdaimpl/docman/Improvements%20to%20C-CDA%20Errata,%20V3%20Template%20Design,%20Example%20Taskforce/Example%20Task%20Force%20-%20best%20practices%20guide%20for%20narrative-entry%20linking.pdf Example Task Force - best practices guide for narrative-entry linking]

Revision as of 20:42, 27 September 2017

Below are the deliverables created to improve to C-CDA Errata, the V3 Template Design, updates to the Example Taskforce

  • Design and deployment of a new C-CDA errata Process
    • The document linked below summarizing the current and proposed future C-CDA errata/DSTU comment process.
    • The attached document includes a suggested migration plan to JIRA
    • The team hosted two requirements sessions to develop and document processes

C-CDA STU Comment and Errata Process - Future State

  • Future C-CDA templates design guide
    • The document linked below is a MS Word template for the development of new C-CDA templates
    • The team completed an analysis of UDI vs Advance Directive vs prior companion guides

Additional CDA Templates Companion Guide Template

  • Example Task Force Updates
    • The document linked below is a best practices guide for narrative-entry linking.
    • The team reviewed this guide with the Example Task Force.
    • The Example Task Force Trello board has been reviewed and cleaned up.

Example Task Force - best practices guide for narrative-entry linking