This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "INM Action Items"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Redirecting to InM Action Items)
 
(668 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Open Action Items.  Each item may be edited individually.
+
#REDIRECT[[InM_Action_Items]]
 
 
== Back to [[Infrastructure and Messaging TC]] ==
 
== ITEM: 1  ==
 
Opened:  12-Jan-03  Old Item:  1
 
  We need to document difference between abstract specification and XML ITS DataTypes. Andrew H will get list of differences from Paul Biron.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 05-Jan-04 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> New <td> XML <td> INM Telcon: Grahame reported that this is still in progress
 
<tr><td> 06-May-04 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> Open <td> XML <td> Still open – slated for release 2
 
<tr><td> 30-Sep-04 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> Open <td> XML <td> CQ WGM: deferred and slated for R2
 
<tr><td> 24-Jan-05 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> Open <td> XML <td> INM WGM Orlando: no change
 
<tr><td> 02-May-05 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> Open <td> XML <td> INM WGM Noordwijkerhout: no change
 
<tr><td> 05-May-05 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> Defered <td> XML <td> we still think this is a good idea, but no progress yet. May happen as part of R2
 
<tr><td> 15-Sep-05 <td> Paul Biron <td> Open <td> XML <td> 20050915 WGM Give to Paul – part of a way to generate requirements for R2
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  15  ==
 
Opened:  24-Jan-05  Old Item:  203
 
  For Version 2.7, add language to Chapter 2 to the effect that CQ does not express an opinion at this time on the restarting of set IDs relative to groups or
 
message.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 24-Jan-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> Open <td> V2 <td> INM WGM Orlando: Motion approved 20050506: edit needs to be done in 2.7
 
<tr><td> 26-Aug-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> Open <td> V2 <td> 20050826: Larson: this item needs a proposal submitted to the v2 database and then it can be closed.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  27  ==
 
Opened:  26-Jan-05  Old Item:  215
 
  Present Units proposal to Facilitators Roundtable on Jan 27
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 26-Jan-05 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> New <td> vocab <td> INM/Vocab WGM Orlando: Agreed to prepare a proposal for Faciliator's Roundtable. Within the PQ datatype Unit: change from CS to CV and allow the domain to be set in the model. Could set a domain and call it Units. This could have sub domains such as UCUM, ISO etc.
 
<tr><td> 04-May-05 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> Open <td> vocab <td> Changed from New to Open, assigned Grahame.
 
<tr><td> 14-Sep-05 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> Open <td> vocab <td> 20050914: IM WGM San Diego: Close – Stan has developed proposal
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  32  ==
 
Opened:  27-Jan-05  Old Item:  220
 
  CQ WGM: ask the Conformance SIG to work on a dynamic discovery message for supported features by the receiver (profile ids, application roles,
 
interactions, responseModeCodes)
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 27-Jan-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> New <td> conform <td> INM WGM Orlando: Added. Ask the Conformance SIG to work on a dynamic discovery message for supported features by the receiver (profile ids, application roles, interactions, responseModeCodes)
 
<tr><td> 02-May-05 <td> Lisa Carnahan <td> Reviewed <td> conform <td> 20050502: Clarified that this is v3, not v2. Len Gallagher has been writing a white paper on the dynamic model which may have some bearing on this item.
 
<tr><td> 14-Sep-05 <td> Lisa Carnahan <td> Reviewed <td> Conform <td> 20050914: Conformance says they do not do this; only have conformance for V2.
 
<tr><td> 16-Sep-05 <td> MNM <td> Open <td> Conform <td> 20050916: Rene says move to MnM
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  33  ==
 
Opened:  28-Jan-05  Old Item:  221
 
  the detectedIssue CMET should be moved to the CMET domain, and not be defined locally in MCAI
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 28-Jan-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Open <td> IM <td> INM WGM Orlando: Added. When creating the next version of MCAI, the detectedIssue CMET should be moved to the CMET domain, and not be defined locally in MCAI Pharmacy has a use-case for a message that shows all controlActs(+detectedIssue) related to a single order. This can be implemented today as a shared message. If implemented  as a wrapper this would require that the tools support stubs with exit points. (transmission wrapper - controlAct - order - 1..n - historic control acts)These issues popped up during a discussion with the Pharmacy group in Orlando.
 
<tr><td> 19-Mar-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Open <td> IM <td> 20050319: Open, this hasn't happened in ballot 10.
 
<tr><td> 19-Mar-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Open <td> IM <td> Open, this hasn't happened in ballot 10.
 
<tr><td> 05-May-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Open <td> IM <td> no information (interested parties not at meeting)
 
<tr><td> 05-May-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Open <td> IM <td> 20050505: no information (interested parties not at meeting)
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  34  ==
 
Opened:  28-Jan-05  Old Item:  222
 
  Need to create a controlAct wrapper for "event replay".
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 28-Jan-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> New <td> IM <td> INM WGM Orlando: Added. Need to create a controlAct wrapper for "event replay". Pharmacy has a use-case for a message that shows all controlActs(+detectedIssue) related to a single order. This can be implemented today as a shared message. If implemented as a wrapper this would require that the tools support stubs with exit points. (transmission wrapper - controlAct - order - 1..n - historic control acts)These issues popped up during a discussion with the Pharmacy group in Orlando.
 
<tr><td> 05-May-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Open <td> IM <td> no information (interested parties not at meeting)
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  42  ==
 
Opened:  08-Mar-05  Old Item:  230
 
  Present introduction to Services Oriented Transport and gain approval to continue work
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 08-Mar-05 <td> Darius Kemeklis <td> New <td> trans <td> INM Telcon: Need to have discussion of service oriented transport. Darius K agreed to put together a presentation
 
<tr><td> 15-Mar-05 <td> Darius Kemeklis <td> Open <td> trans <td> This is a new work item. It was suggested on the transport list that service oriented transports such as JMS or Webservices  offer a lot more functionality than just a "transport". Should we create a new ITS and/or Transport to fully use the services offered by these environments? Darius took the group through a slide show presentation he had prepared.
 
<tr><td> 22-Mar-05 <td> Darius Kemeklis <td> Open <td> trans <td> INM Telcon: Change item description from "Service Oriented Transport" to a description that reflects the action to be taken. The initial presentation has been done. It is unclear if  the next step is clear. Assume that interested parties wish to continue this discussion and perhaps come forward with a proposal. Will change description to: Present introduction to Services Oriented Transport and gain approval to continue work
 
<tr><td> 04-May-05 <td> Darius Kemeklis <td> Open <td> trans <td> open, no nupdate.
 
<tr><td> 15-Sep-05 <td> Darius Kemeklis <td> Open <td> trans <td> 20050915:  Still open-related to ATS spec.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  55  ==
 
Opened:  27-Sep-04  Old Item:  302
 
  Check for vocabulary gaps in V3 Infrastructure Management.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 09-Nov-04 <td> Andrew Hinchley <td> Open <td> IM <td> INM Telcon: No update. René Spronk will talk to Andrew.
 
<tr><td> 14-Dec-04 <td> Andrew Hinchley <td> Open <td> IM <td> INM Telcon: No update.
 
<tr><td> 27-Jan-05 <td> Andrew Hinchley <td> Open <td> IM <td> INM WGM Orlando: no update
 
<tr><td> 01-May-05 <td> Andrew Hinchley <td> Open <td> IM <td> INM WGM Noordwijkerhout: Andrew wil attempt to create it during the WGM.
 
<tr><td> 05-May-05 <td> Andrew Hinchley <td> New <td> IM <td> No information
 
<tr><td> 05-May-05 <td> Andrew Hinchley <td> Open <td> IM <td> No information
 
 
 
<tr><td> 13-Sep-05 <td> Andrew Hinchley <td> Reviewed <td> IM <td> 20050913:INM WGM: open with guilt.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  58  ==
 
Opened:  28-Sep-04  Old Item:  305
 
  Clean up the list of terms definitions after business models have been described
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 18-Nov-04 <td> Robert Grant <td> Open <td> Reg <td> INM Telcon: No update available
 
<tr><td> 25-Jan-05 <td> Robert Grant <td> Open <td> Reg <td> Open. Waiting for models to be finalized.
 
<tr><td> 03-May-05 <td> Robert Grant <td> Open <td> Reg <td> No change
 
 
 
<tr><td> 13-Sep-05 <td> Robert Grant <td> Reviewed <td> Reg <td> 20050913: Still no project page. Talk to Jenni P. about this if needed (if project continues).
 
<tr><td> 13-Sep-05 <td> Robert Grant <td> Reviewed <td> Reg <td> 20050913: No change. Will be cleaned up and packaged with project deliverables.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  59  ==
 
Opened:  28-Sep-04  Old Item:  306
 
  Upload current draft docs to new project specific docs page
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 25-Jan-05 <td> Jean Spohn <td> Open <td> Reg <td> INM WGM Orlando: Dependant on 307; not done. Docs currently list serve distribution (issue with size)
 
<tr><td> 03-May-05 <td> Jean Spohn <td> Open <td> Reg <td> Size increased but still waiting on Mike for website setup before uploading docs
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  60  ==
 
Opened:  28-Sep-04  Old Item:  307
 
  Ask Mike to create a new registry project webpage for uploading
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 18-Nov-04 <td> Gregg Seppala <td> New <td> Reg <td> INM Telcon: Gregg has talked to Mike. Mike agreed to do this. Would show at the bottom of the SIG list. Not done yet. Gregg to follow-up.
 
<tr><td> 25-Jan-05 <td> Gregg Seppala <td> Open <td> Reg <td> INM WGM Orlando:Still waiting on Mike.
 
<tr><td> 03-May-05 <td> Gregg Seppala <td> Open <td> Reg <td> Waiting on Mike for website
 
<tr><td> 13-Sep-05 <td> Gregg Seppala <td> Reviewed <td> Reg <td> 20050913: Still no project page. Talk to Jenni P. about this if needed (if project continues).
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  71  ==
 
Opened:  29-Sep-04  Old Item:  318
 
Draft procedure for agreeing to updates to 396. Will bring draft to CQ.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 12-Jan-05 <td> Stan Huff <td> New <td> vocab <td> Larson: The procedure should incorporate the decision made at the Atlanta WGM as follows: "All changes to sections for which Vocab is the steward, must be submitted to the v2 change proposal database."
 
<tr><td> 04-May-05 <td> Stan Huff <td> Open <td> vocab <td> INM Noordwijkerhout: Stan will wridte procedure. It will include 1) submit to database ; 2) vocab reviews and makes decision  taking in to account such things as redundancy, version and other policy requirements; 3) once approved is immediately valid; 4) notify INM editor Policy needs good definitions but also need to focus on operational factors.
 
<tr><td> 01-Jun-05 <td> Stan Huff <td> Open <td> vocab <td> Vocab Telcon: Discussion – Table 396 issue:  -HL7 v2.x table 396 is the table of tables.  One of the changes in 2.6 was to make content extensible without requiring a re-ballot.  Need to document the process of how we put new entries, or update entries to table 396.  Current process is to submit a V2.x proposal through the HL7 website. -Proposed solution is that every time a terminology is registered in the OID it would automatically go into Table 396 I V2.x.  Vote taken and passed. - The content of tables is only available through the ballot, the document can be updated but there is no place online that you can look it up.  Same problem of how to publish content in-between ballots as content is updated.  Action – Ted to add agenda item for next conference call to discuss process for furthering along V2 exports and dissemination of Table 396 in a timely fashion.
 
<tr><td> 15-Sep-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> Reviewed <td> vocab <td> 20050914: Approved. Tony will check to see if in the substantivity guide.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  74  ==
 
Opened:  29-Sep-04  Old Item:  321
 
  Clarify concept of session in context of transport documents (as opposed to session as defined by SIGSecure)
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 07-Dec-04 <td> Andrew Hinchley <td> Open <td> Trans <td> no update
 
<tr><td> 27-Jan-05 <td> Andrew Hinchley <td> Open <td> Trans <td> INM WGM Orlando: Still open with guilt.
 
<tr><td> 04-May-05 <td> Andrew Hinchley <td> Open <td> Trans <td> no status change.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  81  ==
 
Opened:  30-Sep-04  Old Item:  328
 
  Produce Implementation Guide
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 30-Sep-04 <td> INM Chairs <td> Open <td> XML <td> WGM: not being worked on
 
<tr><td> 24-Jan-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Open <td> XML <td> Q WGM Orlando: not being worked on. Underlying negative line issue may need to be revisited.
 
<tr><td> 02-May-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Open <td> XML <td> INM WGM Noordwijkerhout: in progress. New content has been identified having to do with xsi. This is an extra constraint people want to have on XML instances. This would be a substantive change and would have to go back to ballot. The other approach is to publish ITS as is and put a paragraph in an Implementation Guide regarding xsi.
 
<tr><td> 05-May-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Open <td> XML <td> xsi in notes from 20050502 means xsi:nil. Issue is a little broader than xsi:nil, includes xsi:type. We propose to have an R2 changes proposal for comment in the next ballot or the one after that will cover proposed changes, both documentation and substance. Schema requirements will be included in the multi-cache schema page in the ballot pack (under downloads).
 
<tr><td> 15-Sep-05 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> Open <td> XML <td> 20050915 Grahame to create wiki page, notify xml, strucdoc, and impl lists. Charlie will provide some seed content.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  88  ==
 
Opened:  30-Sep-04  Old Item:  335
 
  contact PIC and develop a procedure to track action items that are referred to other committees
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 06-May-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Open <td> admin <td> no update
 
<tr><td> 16-Sep-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Reviewed <td> Admin <td> 20050916:This does need to go to PIC
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  90  ==
 
Opened:  30-Sep-04  Old Item:  337
 
  Split current model and bring forward the result to CQ
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 30-Sep-04 <td> Miroslav Koncar <td> New <td> IM <td> INM WGM Atlanta. Item added. Nicu Goga, Andrew Hinchley, Darius Kemeklis, Miroslav Koncar and René Spronk will work jointly on this activity.
 
<tr><td> 09-Nov-04 <td> Miroslav Koncar <td> Open <td> IM <td> INM Telcon: René Spronk reported that some members in Europe are thinking about doing an un-official acceleration meeting
 
<tr><td> 14-Dec-04 <td> Miroslav Koncar <td> Open <td> IM <td> INM Telcon: René reported that Miroslav Koncar has created a new draft of the state model but it is not ready for INM review yet. Miroslav will take the lead on this item.
 
<tr><td> 27-Jan-05 <td> Miroslav Koncar <td> Open <td> IM <td> INM WGM Orlando: work in progress, the draft is documented in 901. Message Adapter state model is included, needs to be  finalized before pub of the ballot.
 
<tr><td> 05-May-05 <td> Miroslav Koncar <td> Open <td> IM <td> No information
 
<tr><td> 13-Sep-05 <td> Miroslav Koncar <td> Closed <td> IM <td> 20050913: INM WGM: closed,has been documented in the ATS ballot and MCCI R2.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  96  ==
 
Opened:  01-Oct-04  Old Item:  343
 
  Research how requirements for committee membership and voting may be enforced.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 09-Nov-04 <td> René Spronk <td> New <td> admin <td> INM Telcon: in progress
 
<tr><td> 12-Jan-05 <td> René Spronk <td> Open <td> admin <td> email from Rene as follows:"From our DMP: "Committee meetings are open to all interested parties including but not limited  to members of HL7, HL7 affiliates, and guests of HL7 as referenced in the HL7 Bylaws – Article 3.02.". "Guests are welcome to participate in the work of the committee and are recognized as either guests of HL7, e.g., not a member of HL7,  or guests of the INM TC, e.g., a member of HL7 but not a declared member of the INM TC." "When formal votes are taken the chair will explain the eligibility for voting.  Registered INM TC members shall always receive a vote in keeping with ANSI openness rules. (.. snip ..). For non-binding decisions only, all meeting participants may have the opportunity to vote at the discretion of the presiding chair." - Note that this means that non-declared INM members that participate in a INM meeting don't have a vote.  From the bylaws: "3.03.03 TECHNICAL COMMITTEE AND SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP MEMBERSHIP - Members shall have the opportunity to declare themselves members of any one or more Technical Committees and Special Interest Groups. Maintaining membership in a Technical Committee requires that the member participate in at least 60% of the Technical Committee ballots pertaining to approval or adoption of HL7 protocol specifications, or any portion thereof, cast during the period of one year from the date of declaration." However, the bylaws also state this: "5.01 PARTICIPANTS - Non-members and representative members of all categories and affiliations in good standing and present in  assembly shall be deemed participants and, except as otherwise specifically provided in the bylaws  or policy and procedures, shall have the right to cast a vote in meetings of the  Technical Committees and Special Interest  Groups." - 3.03.03 is contained elsewhere in the bylaws, so it takes precedence over the more generic statement in 5.01 From this one can conclude the following:-Only self-declared registered members of INM have a vote. The lose their right to vote if they don'r ollowinge in at least 60% of all ballots in the year ollowing their sign-up. -The often quoted rule that "all those signed up to the INM e-mail list" automatically are to be seen as "registered INM members" doesn't exist. It seems that at least we'll have to ask HQ for a list of persons that have indicated they want to be a member of INM."
 
<tr><td> 19-Mar-05 <td> René Spronk <td> Open <td> admin <td> rene: needs follow up on a steering call.
 
<tr><td> 06-May-05 <td> René Spronk <td> Open <td> admin <td> Bylaw review is in process, this will be part of it. Joann is following up with them.
 
<tr><td> 16-Sep-05 <td> René Spronk <td> Reviewed <td> admin <td> 20050916: Is being addressed
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  104  ==
 
Opened:  04-May-05  Old Item:  401
 
  Follow up with MnM to see if some of the requirements of the Abstract Transports doc should be in the HDF
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 04-May-05 <td> René Spronk <td> New <td> Transport-abstract <td> created for resolution of a negative line-item.
 
<tr><td> 15-Sep-05 <td> René Spronk <td> Open <td> ATS <td> 20050915: Still open
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  105  ==
 
Opened:  02-May-05  Old Item:  402
 
  Apply correction to Orlando minutes for Q1 Jan 24
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 02-May-05 <td> Doug Pratt <td> New <td> Admin <td> INM WGM Noordwijkerhout: According to the report from Karen Van, the XML ITS Data Types has been submitted to ANSI. Doug will make correction and post to website.
 
<tr><td> 26-Jul-05 <td> Doug Pratt <td> Reviewed <td> Admin <td> 20050726 INM Telcon:  Doug will do this.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  107  ==
 
Opened:  02-May-05  Old Item:  404
 
  Will provide list of terms
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 02-May-05 <td> Lisa Carnahan <td> New <td> Conform <td> INM WGM: Will provide list of terms
 
<tr><td> 12-Sep-05 <td> Lisa Carnahan <td> Open <td> Conform <td> 20050912:INM WGM SanDiego.  Lisa not present – will review.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  108  ==
 
Opened:  02-May-05  Old Item:  405
 
  Provide definition for realm
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 02-May-05 <td> Lisa Carnahan <td> New <td> Conform <td> INM WGM
 
<tr><td> 12-Sep-05 <td> Lisa Carnahan <td> Open <td> Conform <td> 20050912:INM WGM SanDiego.  Lisa not present – will review.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  109  ==
 
Opened:  02-May-05  Old Item:  406
 
  Suggest that Claims Attachments develops a proposal for modification to the attachmentClass and advance it for harmonization
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 02-May-05 <td> Kepa Zubeldia <td> New <td> Attachments  and II/IIRef <td> Noorwijkerhout
 
<tr><td> 15-Sep-05 <td> Kepa Zubeldia <td> Open <td> Attachments  and II/IIRef <td> 20050915 no progress
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  110  ==
 
Opened:  02-May-05  Old Item:  407
 
Complete the documentation for Option #2 and resolve the format of the URN
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 02-May-05 <td> Charlie McCay <td> New <td> Attachments  and II/IIRef <td> Noorwijkerhout
 
<tr><td> 15-Sep-05 <td> Charlie McCay <td> Open <td> Attachments  and II/IIRef <td> 20050915 no progress
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  111  ==
 
Opened:  02-May-05  Old Item:  408
 
after further discussion with MnM: do we need to make versionCode mandatory ? Required once we have multiple versions/Editions.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 02-May-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> New <td> Inter-version  compatibility <td> Noorwijkerhout
 
<tr><td> 12-Aug-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Reviewed <td> Inter-version  compatibility <td> Emil from Rene suggests assigning to Grahame. E-mail sent to Grahame requestig concurrence.
 
<tr><td> 15-Aug-05 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> Open <td> inter-version  compatibility <td> Grahame accepted.
 
<tr><td> 13-Sep-05 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> Open <td> inter-version  compatibility <td> 20050913: INM WGM: open, need MnM to make recommendations as to versioning.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  132  ==
 
Opened:  01-Jul-04  Old Item:  518
 
Request PIC to create a process to ensure that those that bring forward v2 proposals should include a v3 mapping analysis
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 01-Oct-04 <td> Doug Pratt <td> New <td> admin <td> Not always possible (some elements are V2 artifacts) but the analysis needs to be done always.
 
20050506: Doug will ask PIC about status.
 
<tr><td> 16-Sep-05 <td> Joann Larson <td> Open <td> admin <td> 20050916: Joann will take to PIC
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  153  ==
 
Opened:  21-Sep-04  Old Item:  919
 
  Review action items from previous ballot reconciliations.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 27-Aug-04 <td> INM Chairs <td> Closed <td> DT <td> 20040927:  These responsibilities may be able to be split.  Some of it might fall within the purview of XML SIG, but they have been difficult to reach lately.  It might also be well grouped with MnM, but they do not want to add data types to their responsibilities.  Pat Willmott of Sigma Systems volunteered to work with Gunther Schadow on at least already-known issues.
 
<tr><td> 21-Sep-04 <td> INM Chairs <td> Closed <td> DT <td> 20040921: Email from G. Shadow: We should recruit another editor, the person needs to be able to use CVS and to edit the  XML sources of the specification directly.
 
<tr><td> 27-Jan-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Re-Opened <td> DT <td> 20050127: INM WGM Orlando: open. Hard to reconcile ballot records. Confusion between HQ and those working on ballot reconciliation. 20050505: INM WGM Noordwijkerhout: Grahame will work with HQ on this tomorrow 20050915: Given up trying to find these records. Karen will do a final ballot reconciliation notice.
 
<tr><td> 15-Sep-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Open <td> DT <td> 20050915: Given up trying to find these records. Karen will do a final ballot reconciliation notice.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  178  ==
 
Opened:  10-Jan-05  Old Item:  945
 
Guidelines for Attachments proposal status
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 12-Jan-05 <td> Charlie McCay <td> Closed <td> XML - A <td> 20050112 Added by Larson in response to email thread between INM, CDA and XML.
 
20050329 INM Telcon: This is being followed by the Attachments Taskforce cited in item 217. This is a multi-group issue:  XML, IM and Transports. Will be coded as XML.
 
20050505: Closed – track under 945
 
.
 
<tr><td> 05-May-05 <td> Charlie McKay <td> Open <td> XML-A <td> 20050505: INM WGM Noordwijkerhout: Gregor has produced some documentation. Need agenda time at the next meeting.
 
<tr><td> 15-Sep-05 <td> Charlie McKay <td> Open <td> XML-A <td> 20050915 Need agenda time at Scottsdale meeting
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  179  ==
 
Opened:  12-Jan-05  Old Item:  946
 
: Explore Single set of rules for sending Attachments with v3 messages and documents
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 12-Jan-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Open <td> Vocab <td> Added by Larson following receipt of email from Bob Dolin on as follows: "We've created two new MIME types for use with structured documents that we'd like to officially register with INM. The first (text/x-hl7-text+xml) is used to constrain Act.text. The second (text/x-hl7-title+xml) is used to constrain Act.title, which was changed from ST to ED datatype at the last harmonization meeting. Each of these types are undergoing ballot - the former is part of CDA and SPL, the latter is part of SPL. Can you let me know how to proceed?." Later conversation with Bob revealed these 2 new MIME types were heard and approved in RIM Harmonization. What do we do with them now? Is this a v3 or a v2 issue or both? Should these items be added to v2 t Imported Table 0834 "MIME Types" for use in component 3 "Type of Data" in the RP Reference Pointer data type? If so, it would be an HL7 added value to an external table. Or, should it be added to External Table 0291 "Subtype of Referenced Data" as an HL7 enhancement. It would live there alongside our other HL7 enhancement "x-hl7-cda-level- one" for use in component 4 "Subtype" of the RP data type. Ordinarily we require a proposal before adding values to tables.  Perhaps this is strictly a v3 issue? If so, where are these values registered? Are these even Vocab issues?
 
<tr><td> 26-Jan-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Open <td> Vocab <td> INM/Vocab WGM: Add them to v2.7. Grahame will add to the data types document for release 2.
 
<tr><td> 04-May-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Open <td> Vocab <td> INM/Vocab WGM Noordwijkerhout: Confirmed that these are planned for v2.7 and release 2 of v3 data types.
 
<tr><td> 16-Sep-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Open <td> Vocab <td> 20050916: Need to confirm that these changes are on the change list for 2.7 and for V3 Data Types
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  953  ==
 
Opened:  17-Jun-05 
 
This is a test of the addition of a NEW action item from the switchboard
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 17-Jun-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> Closed <td> Test <td> This item is closed
 
<tr><td> 17-Jun-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> New <td> Test <td> This new action item was opened from the ADD on the switchboard.
 
<tr><td> 20-Jun-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> Re-Opened <td> Test <td> This Item was re-opened
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  957  ==
 
Opened:  26-Jul-05 
 
MFMI check the preface for previously known as
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 26-Jul-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> New <td> MFMI <td> 20050726: INM Telcon: Joann reported that HQ needs for us to include the previously balloted name in the preface. This document was originally balloted as a component of the Infrastructure Management document which was last balloted March 2004 as Release 1, membership level 4.
 
<tr><td> 13-Sep-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> Reviewed <td> MFMI <td> 20050913: INM WGM San Diego: no update.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  958  ==
 
Opened:  26-Jul-05 
 
MCCI - Check preface
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 26-Jul-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> New <td> MCCI <td> 20050726: INM Telcon: Joann reported that HQ needs for us to include the previously balloted name in the preface. This document was originally balloted as a component of the Infrastructure Management document which was last balloted March 2004 as Release 1, membership level 4.
 
<tr><td> 13-Sep-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> Reviewed <td> MCCI <td> 20050913: INM WGM San Diego: no update.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  961  ==
 
Opened:  11-Aug-05 
 
Developing a list of basic criteria for shared messages, so that shared messages doesn't end up being a dumping ground.  Perhaps a topic in MCCI R2?
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 11-Aug-05 <td> Lloyd McKenzie <td> Open <td> MCCI <td> INM requests more details.  Lloyd will provide them to Tony, and we will discuss the topic in San Diego.  Lloyd to start a discussion thread about "undo" on MnM list server.  Rene will bring forward notification interactions shared messages. Hope to publish shared messages in January cycle.  Lloyd to offer help with shared messages publication database
 
<tr><td> 11-Aug-05 <td> Lloyd McKenzie <td> Open <td> MCCI <td> Lloyd added a fifth: sending out a "broadcast" message – such as a user notification that the system is going down in 5 minutes, etc. Lloyd needs to forward this last one to INM.
 
<tr><td> 13-Sep-05 <td> Lloyd McKenzie <td> Reviewed <td> MCCI <td> 20050913: INM WGM San Diego: no update.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  962  ==
 
Opened:  11-Aug-05 
 
20050808 CQ Telcon: Tony will compile a list of open action items for the next call, and will e-mail all of the owners of the items.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 11-Aug-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> Open <td> ADMIN <td> E-mail sent to all owners of action items.  Replies will be gathered and reported at the next Telcon. "Colleagues: You have been identified as the owner of an open INM Action Item. We would like to update as many of these as possible before the SanDiego meeting. To this end, would you please download the file http://www.hl7.org/Library/Committees/INM/OpenActionitems20050809%2Epdf from the INM documents page, and take a moment to review the items assigned to you? You may send prepared motions concerning disposition, or comments, to me by e-mail.  I will see that they are included in the agenda for a telcon as soon as time permits. Thanks - and have a GREAT day!"
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  965  ==
 
Opened:  13-Sep-05 
 
Develop a questionnaire so that groups can submit use case attributes and get the best possible recommendation from Security TC.  This will be done
 
through a dialogue.  Discussion of transforms needs to take place in this context.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 13-Sep-05 <td> Glenn Marshall <td> New <td> Security <td> 20050913 WGM NEW.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  966  ==
 
Opened:  13-Sep-05 
 
Tooling should be updated to support SAML, DSIG in schemas.  XML ITS R2 targeted.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 13-Sep-05 <td> Paul Biron <td> New <td> IM <td> 20050913 WGM
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  967  ==
 
Opened:  13-Sep-05 
 
Security TC is requested to read WS security specification and provide guidance and suggestions related thereto.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 13-Sep-05 <td> Glenn Marshall <td> New <td> Security <td> 20050913 WGM: New
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  968  ==
 
Opened:  13-Sep-05 
 
Develop decision tree for the purpose of not tying implementations to potentially mismatched/wrong requirements.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 13-Sep-05 <td> Glenn Marshall <td> New <td> Security <td> 20050913 WGM New.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  970  ==
 
Opened:  03-May-05 
 
20050503: Ask for change to by-law 2.3.1 to permit proprietary ITS.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 03-May-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> New <td> WSP <td> 20050503: INM WGM Noordwijkerhout: Ask for change to by-law 2.3.1 to permit proprietary ITS.
 
<tr><td> 09-Sep-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Reviewed <td> WSP <td> 20050909: Larson: Close occurred on 20050628. Re-opened because other communication suggested INM should seek change to Bylaw 2.03.01. Change request submitted to PIC.
 
<tr><td> 11-Sep-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Reviewed <td> WSP <td> 20050911: Change Request has been forwarded to BPR and discussed in meeting today. Unclear to BPR as to the precise  change INM is seeking. Clarification of policy under consideration..
 
<tr><td> 14-Sep-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Reviewed <td> WSP <td> 20050914WGM In progress
 
<tr><td> 16-Sep-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Reviewed <td> WSP <td> Working on poicy and procedures to cover this.  Plan to submit a change request( we were asked to do this rather than change bylaws)
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  975  ==
 
Opened:  14-Sep-05 
 
Add Religious affiliation codes to 396
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 14-Sep-05 <td> Ted Klein <td> Open <td> v2 ch2 <td> Will mail codes to tony Julian
 
<tr><td> 14-Sep-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> New <td> v2 Ch2 <td> Add Religious affilition codes to table 396
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  976  ==
 
Opened:  07-Oct-05 
 
CNE/CWE 2.7
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 14-Sep-05 <td> Doug Pratt <td> New <td> V2 Cp2a <td> MMS Doug Pratt/Sandy Stuart that the joint working group encourage Doug to submit the stronger text for version 2.7.  11-0-1
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  977  ==
 
Opened:  13-Sep-05 
 
Removable Media
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 13-Sep-05 <td> Doug Pratt <td> New <td> Removable  Media Its <td> Doug will contact Alexander Henket from HL7 Netherlands in re removable media ITS.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  978  ==
 
Opened:  15-Sep-05 
 
Work to add a new batch group class to the batch transmission wrapper.  The new class will contain attributes such as batch ID.  A new sequence
 
number needs to be added to the current batch class as well.  New dynamic models, interactions, etc. need to be documented.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 15-Sep-05 <td> Penny Atchison<td> Open <td> IM <td> 2005-09-15 SAN WGM: New action item.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  979  ==
 
Opened:  15-Sep-05 
 
Develop alternatives/solutions for 962.1 (Domain specific masking)Also for other shared messages items.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 15-Sep-05 <td> René <td> New <td> IM/RX  Spronk/Michael <td> 20050915 WGM new
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  980  ==
 
Opened:  09-Sep-05 
 
20050909: Request change to Bylaw 15
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 09-Sep-05 <td> Joann Larson <td> New <td> Appeals for  DSTU <td> 20050909: Larson: Submitted to PIC: Section 14 of the POLPRO document describes no appeals proces for committee level ballots nor DSTUs. Given that informative ballots have an appeals proces (POLPRO Appendix A, section 5), and that membersip ballots have an appeals process, this is probably an unintentional oversight. -Your negative line items were given the disposition "persuasive" or "persuasive with mod", the appeals proces is only related to items that were found to be "not persuasive". This again probably needs to be addressed when the POLPRO are revised,to include other dispositions as well. -POLPRO 15.10.01 (although meant to be used to appeal "Not Persuasive" decisions in a membership  ballot)states that "If, in a two-thirds majority opinion of the Board of Directors, there is found to be insufficient cause for confirmation and  appeal [i.e. a special ballot round] the request shall recieve no further action beyond subsequent notification of the requester".
 
<tr><td> 11-Sep-05 <td> Joann Larson <td> Open <td> Appeals for  DSTU <td> 20050911: Larson: Discussed in BPR. I did not have the issue statement handy, so reconstructed from memory. Feedback was that the Appeals process is open only to line items found Not Persuasive.
 
<tr><td> 16-Sep-05 <td> Joann Larson <td> Reviewed <td> Appeals for  DSTU <td> 20050916: We should rule things not persuasive (as opposed to persuasive with mod) unless submitter is ok with the mod.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  997  ==
 
Opened:  03-Oct-05 
 
20051003: Prepare RFI for Chapter 2, 2A and 2B
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 03-Oct-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> New <td> V2 <td> 20051003: INM Telcon: Prepare RFI for Chapter 2, 2A and 2B. Due October 3. [now changed to OCT 17]
 
<tr><td> 10-Oct-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Reviewed <td> V2 <td> 20051010: Approved- to be submitted to HQ.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  999  ==
 
Opened:  03-Oct-05 
 
20051003: Prepare RFI for Chapter 5
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 03-Oct-05 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> New <td> V2 <td> 20051003: INM Telcon: Prepare RFI for Chapter 5. Due October 3. [now changed to OCT 17]
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1000  ==
 
Opened:  03-Oct-05 
 
20051003: Prepare RFI for Chapter 8
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 03-Oct-05 <td> Joann Larson <td> New <td> V2 <td> 20051003: INM Telcon: Prepare RFI for Chapter 8. Due October 3. [now changed to OCT 17]
 
<tr><td> 10-Oct-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Reviewed <td> v2 <td> 20051010 Approved: to be submitted to HQ
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1001  ==
 
Opened:  03-Oct-05 
 
20051003: Prepare Project Scope and RFI for Chapter 14
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 03-Oct-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> New <td> V2 <td> 20051003: INM Telcon: Prepare RFI for Chapter 14. Due October 3. [now changed to OCT 17]
 
<tr><td> 10-Oct-05 <td> INM Chairs <td> Reviewed <td> V2 <td> 20051010: Approved to be submitted to HQ.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1002  ==
 
Opened:  03-Oct-05 
 
20051003: Prepare Project Scope and RFI for Removable Media
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 03-Oct-05 <td> Doug Pratt <td> New <td> V2 <td> 20051003: INM Telcon: Prepare RFI for Removable Media. Due October 3. [now changed to OCT 17]
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1003  ==
 
Opened:  03-Oct-05 
 
20051003: Prepare Project Scope and RFI for ebXML
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 03-Oct-05 <td> Doug Pratt <td> New <td> ebXML <td> 20051003: Prepare Project Scope and RFI for ebXML Due Oct 17
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1004  ==
 
Opened:  03-Oct-05 
 
20051003: Post Project Scope for Data Types Abstract and related documents XML ITS DT and UML.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 03-Oct-05 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> New <td> ITS <td> 20051003: Post Project Scope for Data Types Abstract and related documents XML ITS DT and UML.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1005  ==
 
Opened:  03-Oct-05 
 
20051003: Prepare RFI for Data Types Abstract
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 03-Oct-05 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> New <td> Data Types <td> 20051003: INM Telcon: Prepare RFI for Data Types Abstract. Needs to be approved and posted by Oct 17.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1006  ==
 
Opened:  03-Oct-05 
 
20051003: Prepare RFI for XML ITS Data Types
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 03-Oct-05 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> New <td> XML ITS <td> 20051003: INM Telcon: Prepare RFI for XML Its Data Types. Needs to be approved and posted by Oct 17.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1007  ==
 
Opened:  03-Oct-05 
 
20051003: Prepare RFI for UML
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 03-Oct-05 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> New <td> UML <td> 20051003: INM Telcon: Prepare RFI for UML. Needs to be approved and posted by Oct 17.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1008  ==
 
Opened:  03-Oct-05 
 
20051003: Post UML reconciliation package for May 2005 ballot.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 03-Oct-05 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> New <td> UML <td> Post UML reconcillation Package for May 2005 ballot
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1009  ==
 
Opened:  03-Oct-05 
 
20051003: Request withdrawal of negative votes against UML May 2005 ballot.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 03-Oct-05 <td> Grahame Grieve <td> New <td> UML <td> 20051003: INM Telcon: After Reconciliation Package is posted, need to officially request voters to withdraw negative votes by November 14.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1010  ==
 
Opened:  03-Oct-05 
 
20051003: Notify HQ that agreed upon acronym for Infrastructure and Messaging is INM
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 03-Oct-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> New <td> Admin <td> Notify HQ that agreed upon acronym  is INM
 
<tr><td> 03-Oct-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> Reviewed <td> Admin <td> E-mail sent to HQ: From: Julian, Anthony J. Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 2:43 PM To: 'Karen Van Hentenryck (HL7)' Cc: INM@lists.hl7.org Subject: INM( the Technical Committee formerly known as INM) Karen: During today's teleconference, the Infrastructure and Messaging Technical Committee unanimously voted to change the abbreviated name of the Technical Committee from INM to INM. Anthony (Tony) Julian HL7 Infrastructure and Messaging Technical Committee Co-Chair(Formerly Control/Query)
 
<tr><td> 10-Oct-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> Closed <td> Admin <td> Closed - work done
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1011  ==
 
Opened:  03-Oct-05 
 
20051003: Seek approval from John Quinn to advance to v2.6 membership ballot 3 with substantive change.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 03-Oct-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> New <td> Admin <td> 20051003: INM Telcon: Joann L reported that she had sent an email to John Quinn on SEP 26 seeking approval to advance to v2.6 membership ballot 3 with substantive change. No response has been obtained as of yet. A second request will be sent. May need to revisit decision regarding length changes if no response.
 
<tr><td> 10-Oct-05 <td> Joann Larson <td> Reviewed <td> Admin <td> 20051010: INM Telcon: Second request sent to John Quinn on October 6. Will need to follow-up with Karen Van as to next step if no reply soon; would appear that, if approval not attained, we will need to return to committee ballot or retract the change.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1012  ==
 
Opened:  03-Oct-05 
 
20051003: Inquire of Pubs and MNM as to the proper name for WSnnn (implementation guidelines)
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 03-Oct-05 <td> Joann Larson <td> New <td> WSP <td> 20051003: INM Telcon: Reconciliation of negative line item 5 in WSP September 2005 ballot. Agreement reached that the WSnnn things (Implementation Guidelines) will be changed to a name that is consistent with similar instances in other domains.  Need to follow-up with Pubs and MNM as to the proper name.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1013  ==
 
Opened:  03-Oct-05 
 
20051003: Prepare a discussion document on differentiating assertions in the WSP by Nov 28th.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 03-Oct-05 <td> Paul Biron <td> New <td> WSP <td> 20051003: INM Telcon: Reconciliation of negative line item 18 in WSP September 2005 ballot. It is unclear if we need to differentiate assertions: those dealing with how message looks on the wire vs those assertions that do not affect the wire format. Perhaps these should be in different sections. How would these be factorized? To be revisited Nov 28th.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1014  ==
 
Opened:  03-Oct-05 
 
20051003: Post MLLP reconcillation
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 03-Oct-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> New <td> MLLP <td> Post Reconcillation Package
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1015  ==
 
Opened:  10-Oct-05 
 
20051010: INM Telcon: Follow-up with Vocab on proposal 438 to add new values to table 0396 to support ePrescribing proposal.
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 10-Oct-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> New <td> Vocab <td> 20051010: INM Telcon: Follow-up with Vocab on proposal 438 to add new values to table 0396 to support ePrescribing proposal.
 
<tr><td> 10-Oct-05 <td> Tony Julian <td> Open <td> Vocab <td> 20051011: E-mail sent " Colleagues: Do you wish to add these values to table396 in V2.6 to support ePrescibingproposal" including proposal 438.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1016  ==
 
Opened:  10-Oct-05 
 
20051010: INM Telcon: Prepare draft, revised COMT document for inclusion in upcoming ballot cycle
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 10-Oct-05 <td> Michael Van <td> New <td> COMT  Campen <td> 20051010: INM Telcon: Prepare draft, revised COMT document for inclusion in upcoming ballot cycle, pending INM approval.  This is to address requirements from HL7 Canada in 3 areas : Masking, Notes and Broadcasting.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1017  ==
 
Opened:  10-Oct-05 
 
20051010: INM Telcon: Prepare Project Scope and RFI for COMT for inclusion in upcoming ballot cycle
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 10-Oct-05 <td> Michael Van <td> New <td> COMT  Campen <td> 20051010: INM Telcon: Prepare Project Scope and RFI for COMT for inclusion in upcoming ballot cycle. To be considered at the October 17th Telcon.
 
<tr><td> 17-Oct-05 <td> Michael Van <td> New <td> COMT  Campen <td> 20051017: INM Telcon: Closed - submitted for ballot.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1018  ==
 
Opened:  10-Oct-05 
 
20051010: INM Telcon: Seek harmonization of definitions in glossary for Sender and Receiver
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 10-Oct-05 <td> Joann Larson <td> New <td> WSP <td> 20051010: INM Telcon: Seek harmonization of definitions in glossary for Sender and Receiver. Specifically need to follow-up  with Pubs. Roberto will send info to Joann.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1019  ==
 
Opened:  24-Oct-05 
 
MCCI  Ballot reconcillation, Item 4 and 5
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 24-Oct-05 <td> René Spronk <td> New <td> MCCI <td> This comment is not about the MCCI domain. CQ to create an action item to have a definition be added to the glossary. Rene/Michael 3-0-0
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 
== ITEM:  1020  ==
 
Opened:  24-Oct-05 
 
MCCI Ballot Reconcillation Item 14:
 
<table border="1">
 
<tr><td> 24-Oct-05 <td> René Spronk <td> New <td> MCCI <td> This new release of MCCI is (by the very fact that it is a new release) out of sync with the v3guide. CQ will create an action item to work with publishing to change the v3guide.
 
<tr>
 
</table>
 

Latest revision as of 20:38, 14 January 2008

Redirect to: