Difference between revisions of "ICTC concall 20071206"
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
*Sarah Ryan | *Sarah Ryan | ||
| + | *V2 conformance | ||
For v2 conformance only there were two topics of discussion: cardinality and usage/behavior | For v2 conformance only there were two topics of discussion: cardinality and usage/behavior | ||
There is agreement that the existing documentation for conformance is good but that minor tweaks should be made. It was stated that there is some ambiguity in the usage section and there are errors in the cardinality section. For example, if there is extra data based on the cardinality, should that data be ignored or should an error occur. We also believed that cardinality is an easier topic than usage/behavior; so there was agreement to split the two topics and treat them independent for now. | There is agreement that the existing documentation for conformance is good but that minor tweaks should be made. It was stated that there is some ambiguity in the usage section and there are errors in the cardinality section. For example, if there is extra data based on the cardinality, should that data be ignored or should an error occur. We also believed that cardinality is an easier topic than usage/behavior; so there was agreement to split the two topics and treat them independent for now. | ||
Next week’s call should discuss edits to clarify cardinality. | Next week’s call should discuss edits to clarify cardinality. | ||
At the next WGM meeting there should be a quarter dedicated to discuss usage. | At the next WGM meeting there should be a quarter dedicated to discuss usage. | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | *DSTU testing. | ||
Due to competing resources the project has not made good progress in the last few months. However, ICSR has agreed to work with ICTC in their DSTU testing to “test” any guidance that is provided. | Due to competing resources the project has not made good progress in the last few months. However, ICSR has agreed to work with ICTC in their DSTU testing to “test” any guidance that is provided. | ||
Latest revision as of 14:53, 13 December 2007
Thursday 6th December
12:30 AM (US Eastern Time, GMT -5) Please consult http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock for your local times Phone Number: 702-894-2444 Participant Passcode: 64484340
Return to ICTC meeting notes.
Agenda
- Approve the Agenda
- approve minutes from previous call ICTC concall 20071108
- actions from previous call ICTC concall 20071108
- conformance usage section
- DSTU project
- WGM agenda
Notes from Call
- Russell McDonald
- Eric
- Jason Rock
- Leonard Gebase NIST
- Rob Snelick NIST
- Pete Rodney VA
- John Silva Phillips
- Sarah Ryan
- V2 conformance
For v2 conformance only there were two topics of discussion: cardinality and usage/behavior There is agreement that the existing documentation for conformance is good but that minor tweaks should be made. It was stated that there is some ambiguity in the usage section and there are errors in the cardinality section. For example, if there is extra data based on the cardinality, should that data be ignored or should an error occur. We also believed that cardinality is an easier topic than usage/behavior; so there was agreement to split the two topics and treat them independent for now. Next week’s call should discuss edits to clarify cardinality. At the next WGM meeting there should be a quarter dedicated to discuss usage.
- DSTU testing.
Due to competing resources the project has not made good progress in the last few months. However, ICSR has agreed to work with ICTC in their DSTU testing to “test” any guidance that is provided.
Actions:
- Jason will update the DSTU wiki page.
- Leonard would provide details about changes he would like to make about cardinality and usage/behavior
