This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here

Difference between revisions of "Fundamental Principles of FHIR"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Gwbeeler moved page FHIR Precepts to Fundamental Principles of FHIR: Better states What it is)
Line 21: Line 21:
  
  
==It should be clear to a reader the distinction between and the normative portions of the specification material and related information such as reference implementations==
+
==FHIR strives to create distinction between normative and non-normative content==
 +
It should be clear to a reader the distinction between and the normative portions of the specification material and related information such as reference implementations
 
*see [[20140415_FGB_concall]]
 
*see [[20140415_FGB_concall]]

Revision as of 03:05, 29 April 2014

Precepts are (Ron - insert language explaining precepts here)

See also Establishing Precepts in HL7

See Also FHIR Governance Precepts for early FGB start at a precepts spread sheet

FHIR prioritizes implementation

This is the most fundamental precept of FHIR. Most other precepts exist to support this objective.

Rationale: Standards that don't get implemented (or are implemented poorly) benefit no-one. Standards that place theoretical correctness, clinical appropriateness, modeling approach, preferred architecture or any other priority above implementability are unlikely to see significant adoption and thus will produce little overall benefit. That doesn't mean that other considerations can't be taken into account, only that implementability must remain a primary objective.

FHIR is free

All information that is essential to developing and implementing systems that can communicate using FHIR should be available to all interested parties without cost

Rationale: FHIR is a standard that supports interoperability in spaces that HL7 has not traditionally worked in. As a result, many of those who will need the standard are not members (and are unlikely to become members) to see if FHIR is relevant/right for them. As well, many implementers and governmental projects are reluctant to make use of standards that aren't freely available. Interoperability standards benefit from a network effect - the more broadly they're supported, the more useful they are.

FHIR tries to keep the common things simple

FHIR leverages off-the-shelf technologies

FHIR strives to create distinction between normative and non-normative content

It should be clear to a reader the distinction between and the normative portions of the specification material and related information such as reference implementations