This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here

Difference between revisions of "FHIR Maturity Model"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
 
* FMM5 = FMM4 + the artifact has been published in two formal publication release cycles and has been implemented in at least 3 independent production systems in more than one country
 
* FMM5 = FMM4 + the artifact has been published in two formal publication release cycles and has been implemented in at least 3 independent production systems in more than one country
  
Any of the criteria can be waved provided the sponsoring WG can convince the FMG that that criteria should not apply in the case of a specific artifact.
+
Any of the criteria can be waived provided the sponsoring WG can convince the FMG that that criteria should not apply in the case of a specific artifact.

Revision as of 21:35, 3 June 2015

This page describes the 5 level FHIR maturity model for resources. It's based on the CMM framework, and the intention is to give implementers a sense of how mature a resource is

  • FMM0 = the resource or profile (artifact) has been published on the current build
  • FMM1 = FMM0 + the artifact produces no warnings during the build process and the responsible WG has indicated that they consider the artifact substantially complete and ready for implementation
  • FMM2 = FMM1 + the artifact has been tested at an HL7 International connectathon
  • FMM3 = FMM2 + the artifact has been subject to a round of formal balloting with at least 10 implementer comments drawn from at least 3 organizations resulting in at least one substantive change
  • FMM4 = FMM3 + the artifact has been tested across its scope, published in a formal publication (e.g. DSTU), and implemented in multiple prototype projects
  • FMM5 = FMM4 + the artifact has been published in two formal publication release cycles and has been implemented in at least 3 independent production systems in more than one country

Any of the criteria can be waived provided the sponsoring WG can convince the FMG that that criteria should not apply in the case of a specific artifact.