This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
FHIR Consent March 4, 2016
Back to HL7 FHIR Consent Directive Project
Attendees
| Member Name | x | Member Name | x | Member Name | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | Johnathan ColemanCBCC Co-Chair | x | Kathleen Connor FM Co-Chair | x | John MoehrkeSecurity Co-Chair | |||
| . | Alexander Mense | . | Russell McDonell | . | Tarik Idris | |||
| x | Marty Prahl | . | Diana Proud-Madruga | . | Pat Pyette | |||
| . | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair | x | David Staggs | x | Glen Marshall | |||
| x | Rob Horn | . | Beth Pumo | x | William Kinsley | |||
| x | Ken Salyards | . | unknown | . | unknown |
Agenda
- Cochair introduction, roll, agenda and [FHIR Consent February 26, 2016]]minutes
- Report on FM's review of pre-applied changes to FM CP 9533
- Aligning definitions between Provenance, AuditEvent, Contract, and Consent -- Kathleen's spreadsheet
- Discuss CP 9568 CP 9568 Revise ConsentDirective.signer definition in light of FM CP 9567 Revise Contract.signer definition, which FM approved last week, although there is now a friendly amendment proposed for consideration this week.
- Discuss progress on Plan for completing the draft of the PCD IG
Minutes
- TBD chaired
- Agenda and Minute approval...
- RE Pre-applied amendments to FM CP 9533 to change cardinality for Contract.signer described above and pre-applied here] was not approved.
Plan is to only change Signature cardinality in the official version of Contract.signer to 1..* Rationale: We could not come up with any plausible use case were a signer to a contract would not also be a party. Any Contract.signer is a party to the Contract and must be specified. Paul moved, Andy seconded 0-0-3.
