Difference between revisions of "Eclipse OHF Conformance Questions"

Revision as of 05:50, 5 June 2006

-- Eclipse OHF conformance questions --

What are topics good for? Should a conformance editor try to build these from the information found elsewhere in the schema?
How would you use a use case? Is there any examples of a usefully populated use case?
How do interaction models get stored in the document? Do they? Should the conformance profile editor support them?
"A static definition is compliant in all aspects with the HL7 defined message it profiles". Presumably this should be "should" not "is". Is this something that can be checked?
does "" count as content for required content? For RE?
does "" count as content for the presence of a segment?
the condition predicate - let's be more precise about it. let's allow flags in the xml for the kind of language used to build the rule
Annotations - what kind of formatting markup is allowed?
how do you use regex to specify inter-element relationships?
what is the root context when an XPath constraint or element relationship is evaluated?
how does OCL work? Can I bring in the HL7Connect implementation?
the format allows for segment groups, but the narrative doesn't discuss this
There's a number of issues in the schema around the changes introduced in v2.6
if a message contains content not described by the conformance profile, is the message in violation of the conformance profile?
what about Z segments?

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 * how does OCL work? Can I bring in the HL7Connect implementation?
 * the format allows for segment groups, but the narrative doesn't discuss this
-* There's a number of issues in the schema
+* There's a number of issues in the schema around the changes introduced in v2.6
+* if a message contains content not described by the conformance profile, is the message in violation of the conformance profile?
+* what about Z segments?