This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Eclipse OHF Conformance Questions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rene spronk (talk | contribs) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* How would you use a use case? Is there any examples of a usefully populated use case? | * How would you use a use case? Is there any examples of a usefully populated use case? | ||
* How do interaction models get stored in the document? Do they? Should the conformance profile editor support them? | * How do interaction models get stored in the document? Do they? Should the conformance profile editor support them? | ||
+ | **Should it support them: definitely. We need to be able to express dynamic constraints as well as static model constraints. | ||
* "A static definition is compliant in all aspects with the HL7 defined message it profiles". Presumably this should be "should" not "is". Is this something that can be checked? | * "A static definition is compliant in all aspects with the HL7 defined message it profiles". Presumably this should be "should" not "is". Is this something that can be checked? | ||
* does "" count as content for required content? For RE? | * does "" count as content for required content? For RE? | ||
Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
* how does OCL work? Can I bring in the HL7Connect implementation? | * how does OCL work? Can I bring in the HL7Connect implementation? | ||
* the format allows for segment groups, but the narrative doesn't discuss this | * the format allows for segment groups, but the narrative doesn't discuss this | ||
− | * There's a number of issues in the schema | + | * There's a number of issues in the schema around the changes introduced in v2.6 |
+ | * if a message contains content not described by the conformance profile, is the message in violation of the conformance profile? | ||
+ | * what about Z segments? |
Latest revision as of 06:17, 6 June 2006
-- Eclipse OHF conformance questions --
- What are topics good for? Should a conformance editor try to build these from the information found elsewhere in the schema?
- How would you use a use case? Is there any examples of a usefully populated use case?
- How do interaction models get stored in the document? Do they? Should the conformance profile editor support them?
- Should it support them: definitely. We need to be able to express dynamic constraints as well as static model constraints.
- "A static definition is compliant in all aspects with the HL7 defined message it profiles". Presumably this should be "should" not "is". Is this something that can be checked?
- does "" count as content for required content? For RE?
- does "" count as content for the presence of a segment?
- the condition predicate - let's be more precise about it. let's allow flags in the xml for the kind of language used to build the rule
- Annotations - what kind of formatting markup is allowed?
- how do you use regex to specify inter-element relationships?
- what is the root context when an XPath constraint or element relationship is evaluated?
- how does OCL work? Can I bring in the HL7Connect implementation?
- the format allows for segment groups, but the narrative doesn't discuss this
- There's a number of issues in the schema around the changes introduced in v2.6
- if a message contains content not described by the conformance profile, is the message in violation of the conformance profile?
- what about Z segments?