This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "EA IP"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
* [http://healthlevelseven.projectinsight.net/Content/Files/Download.aspx?2009JAN_PROJSCOPE_ArB_Charlie_Mead_Enterprise_Architecutre_Spec.doc Architecture Definition Project Statement]  
 
* [http://healthlevelseven.projectinsight.net/Content/Files/Download.aspx?2009JAN_PROJSCOPE_ArB_Charlie_Mead_Enterprise_Architecutre_Spec.doc Architecture Definition Project Statement]  
* [http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/883/Koehn_status_20090126.pdf Status Report] from Marc Koehn 20090126
+
* [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/873/1949/Koehn_status_20090126.pdf Status Report] from Marc Koehn 20090126
* [http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/747/623/HL7%20EA-IP%20PSS%20v2009.1.doc Project Scope Statement] for EA IP Phase 1
+
* [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/747/955/HL7EA-IPPSSv2009.1.doc Project Scope Statement] for EA IP Phase 1
 
* [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/4115/20090720%20TSC_EAIP_Rpt%204.pdf Status Report] from marc Koehn 20090720
 
* [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/4115/20090720%20TSC_EAIP_Rpt%204.pdf Status Report] from marc Koehn 20090720
  
 
==Presentation Materials==
 
==Presentation Materials==
* [http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/747/610/HL7_SAEAF_impacts_20090110.ppt Draft Impact Statements] Presented at Jan2009 WGM
+
* [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/747/942/HL7_SAEAF_impacts_20090110.ppt Draft Impact Statements] Presented at Jan2009 WGM
 
*[http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/821/HL7-EA-IP-Phase%201%20-%20Wed%20Q3%20Overview.ppt Jan2009 WGM Wednesday Q3 Overview]
 
*[http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/821/HL7-EA-IP-Phase%201%20-%20Wed%20Q3%20Overview.ppt Jan2009 WGM Wednesday Q3 Overview]
*[http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/747/622/HL7-EA-IP-Phase%201%20-%20Getting%20There_V20090202.ppt Draft slide deck] for 20090202 TSC Conference Call discussion
+
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/747/954/HL7-EA-IP-Phase1-GettingThere_V20090202.ppt Draft slide deck] for 20090202 TSC Conference Call discussion
 
*[http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/frs/?group_id=64 SAEAF Slide decks] released 2009-03-02
 
*[http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/frs/?group_id=64 SAEAF Slide decks] released 2009-03-02
* 2009MayWGM Wednesday [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/747/706/HL7-EA-IP-Phase%201%20-%20Moving%20Closer(V1-03).ppt Q3 Slide Deck]
+
* 2009MayWGM Wednesday [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/747/1036/HL7-EA-IP-Phase1-MovingCloserV1-03.ppt Q3 Slide Deck]
 
*2009-07-15 SAEAF Specification Stack Webinar [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/4016/HL7SAEAF_SpecificationStack-July09.ppt slides]
 
*2009-07-15 SAEAF Specification Stack Webinar [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/4016/HL7SAEAF_SpecificationStack-July09.ppt slides]
  
Line 26: Line 26:
 
*[http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/822/HL7%20RASCI%20v1.1.xls RASCI Responsibility Matrix] draft per [http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/823/KenRubinemail.pdf Ken Rubin]
 
*[http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/822/HL7%20RASCI%20v1.1.xls RASCI Responsibility Matrix] draft per [http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/823/KenRubinemail.pdf Ken Rubin]
 
*[http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/825/HL7%20RASCI%20v2.1-postARB%20discussion.xls RASCI Responsibility Matrix v2.1] revision from Jan2009WGM - 20090115 ArB discussion
 
*[http://newgforge.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/825/HL7%20RASCI%20v2.1-postARB%20discussion.xls RASCI Responsibility Matrix v2.1] revision from Jan2009WGM - 20090115 ArB discussion
* draft [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/747/716/HL7%20EA-IP%20-%20Internal%20Engagement%20Plan(Draft-Outline).doc Internal Engagement Plan]
+
* draft [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/747/1046/HL7EA-IP-InternalEngagementPlanDraft-Outline.doc Internal Engagement Plan]
  
 
==Comments==
 
==Comments==
Line 36: Line 36:
 
**Bottom-up test, or "alpha" projects
 
**Bottom-up test, or "alpha" projects
 
*where the "alpha" project would be a sub-project of the architecture rollout.
 
*where the "alpha" project would be a sub-project of the architecture rollout.
* (draft) Alpha Project [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/747/708/HL7%20Alpha%20Project%20Charter%20-%20TEMPLATE.doc charter template]  
+
* (draft) Alpha Project [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/747/1038/HL7AlphaProjectCharter-TEMPLATE.doc charter template]  
 
* (draft) Alpha Project [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/747/709/HL7%20EA-IP%20-%20Alpha%20Project%20Considerations%20(DRAFT-V2).doc considerations]
 
* (draft) Alpha Project [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/tracker/download.php/52/313/747/709/HL7%20EA-IP%20-%20Alpha%20Project%20Considerations%20(DRAFT-V2).doc considerations]
 
**The goal is to use these charters to validate our overall Alpha strategy by, among other things, confirming the level of coverage over the thing-formerly-known-as-SAEAF that we can achieve through our collaboration. Receipt of the charter would be the trigger to formalize Alpha status through the TSC and to coordinate various kick-off calls with the ArB.
 
**The goal is to use these charters to validate our overall Alpha strategy by, among other things, confirming the level of coverage over the thing-formerly-known-as-SAEAF that we can achieve through our collaboration. Receipt of the charter would be the trigger to formalize Alpha status through the TSC and to coordinate various kick-off calls with the ArB.

Revision as of 17:33, 19 September 2009

Enterprise Architecture Implementation Project (EA IP)

This Wiki page was created for the HL7 Enterprise Architecture Implementation Project (EA IP). The Architecture Board is a TSC-appointed committee to define an architecture for the work of the HL7 body. The TSC is responsible for the rollout of that architecture. This site is intended to both provide and elicit communication on, for and about the Implementation Project.

General Information

Presentation Materials

Discussion Items

Comments

Please use the discussion tab above.

Implementation Plans

  • Discussion has occurred various implementation approaches, including
    • Top-down reorganization
    • Bottom-up test, or "alpha" projects
  • where the "alpha" project would be a sub-project of the architecture rollout.
  • (draft) Alpha Project charter template
  • (draft) Alpha Project considerations
    • The goal is to use these charters to validate our overall Alpha strategy by, among other things, confirming the level of coverage over the thing-formerly-known-as-SAEAF that we can achieve through our collaboration. Receipt of the charter would be the trigger to formalize Alpha status through the TSC and to coordinate various kick-off calls with the ArB.
    • Alpha project candidates or volunteers include:
      1. CTS2 - Common Terminology Services 2(Project Insight # 324) - charter draft in progress
      2. PASS - Privacy, Access and Security Services Functional Model (Project Insight #200)
      3. CDA R3 - Clinical Document Architecture Release 3 (Project Insight #477)
      4. Various NCI Initiatives (NCI deployed four services 20090105 developed under SAEAF architecture).
      5. Others from earlier reference
        • US VA/DOD project is poised as alpha project [1] TSC Tracker #858
        • ACS Cardiology DAM
        • Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK (David Bowen). Pilot planned to start in 2009 Q2.
  • John Koisch in an email from the ArB summarized for consideration by the TSC, proposed from ArB WGM minutes, listed by project, with some brief notes about why the ArB thinks they are interesting <<as>> Alpha projects:
    1. DOD VA EHR-FM -- Message portfolio ; Creates analysis specs for prioritized EHR profiles
    2. Pa Registies (More than one) -- Most of the analysis done, service interfaces
    3. COPPA - National Person Registry; Captures RIM semantics, uses instances of the Behavioral Framework(BF); Set of artifacts already done
    4. OO -- Complex Behavioral models(instances of the Behavioral Framework(BF)) and access patterns
    5. Patient access to quality care (PAQC) -- Infoway; Messaging expressed in a services metaphor
    6. CTS2 -- Terminology Services
    7. Medicine Identity Reconcillation -- PHARMA ; Pushes on OMG harmonization ; Uses EIS for medicine identification
    8. PASS -- Directing OHT to pull together the work from MCI, Infoway, NeHTA, NHS
    9. PHER -- Immunization registry.