This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Document relationships in CDA header"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Frankoemig (talk | contribs) m (added rationale) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{CDA R3 | + | {{CDA R3 Open Proposals}} |
Return to [[Structured Documents TC|SDTC]] page; Return to [[:category:CDA R3 Formal Proposals|CDA R3 Formal Proposals]] page. | Return to [[Structured Documents TC|SDTC]] page; Return to [[:category:CDA R3 Formal Proposals|CDA R3 Formal Proposals]] page. | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
== Resolution == | == Resolution == | ||
| + | Sept 9, 2010: Unclear which additional relationship types are needed for relatedDocument in the Header. Will close this for now, but ask Frank to request specific types based on known use cases/requirements. Opposed: 0; abstain: 0; in favor: 14. | ||
Latest revision as of 14:43, 9 September 2010
Return to SDTC page; Return to CDA R3 Formal Proposals page.
| Submitted by: Frank Oemig | Revision date: 29.09.09 |
| Submitted date: 16.07.09 (proposal), 29.09.09 (formal proposal) | Change request ID: <<Change Request ID>> |
Issue
- Currently, relationships between documents can be established in two ways. Either as a general replacement in the header (relatedDocument) or as external links within the body. The first only provides some means to handle versioning of documents. The second can be used from specific entries only. Therefore, CDA as of now does not provide any means to refer to other documents in general.
Recommendation
- Add a new relationship to the header for general relationships. Perhaps similar to what has been done with reference?
Rationale
- One would like to indicate that the document as a whole refers to a set of other documents. The typeCode should indicate the relationship to those documents.
Discussion
Recommended Action Items
Resolution
Sept 9, 2010: Unclear which additional relationship types are needed for relatedDocument in the Header. Will close this for now, but ask Frank to request specific types based on known use cases/requirements. Opposed: 0; abstain: 0; in favor: 14.
