This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Discussion on Proposed Change to MolecularBiomarker Definition"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ Return to BRIDG ===Proposed Change to MolecularBiomarker Definition (row 52)=== ====Original Definition==== DEFINITION: An individual mutation that alone or ...")
 
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 
DEFINITION:  An individual mutation that alone or together with other mutations contributes to a medical conclusion.
 
DEFINITION:  An individual mutation that alone or together with other mutations contributes to a medical conclusion.
 +
 +
TYPO CORRECTION - PROPOSED DEFINITION IS ACTUALLY:  A molecular biological characteristic that can be evaluated as an indicator of biological functions, processes, or therapeutic responses.
  
 
EXAMPLE(S):  L10I, K20R, M36I, A71V, V82T  <= SHOULD THESE BE CONSISTENT WITH THE EXAMPLE SCENARIO USED ACROSS ALL MOLECULAR BIOLOGY CLASSES???
 
EXAMPLE(S):  L10I, K20R, M36I, A71V, V82T  <= SHOULD THESE BE CONSISTENT WITH THE EXAMPLE SCENARIO USED ACROSS ALL MOLECULAR BIOLOGY CLASSES???

Revision as of 23:09, 22 February 2016

Return to BRIDG

Proposed Change to MolecularBiomarker Definition (row 52)

Original Definition

DEFINITION: An individual mutation that alone or together with other mutations contributes to a medical conclusion.

EXAMPLE(S): L10I, K20R, M36I, A71V, V82T

OTHER NAME(S): Biological State

NOTE(S):

Ballot Comment

A mutation is only one type of molecular biomarker. A molecular biomarker does not have to yield a medical-level conclusion. This suggestion is similar to the NIH Biomarkers Definitions Working Group definition.

Proposed Definition

DEFINITION: An individual mutation that alone or together with other mutations contributes to a medical conclusion.

TYPO CORRECTION - PROPOSED DEFINITION IS ACTUALLY: A molecular biological characteristic that can be evaluated as an indicator of biological functions, processes, or therapeutic responses.

EXAMPLE(S): L10I, K20R, M36I, A71V, V82T <= SHOULD THESE BE CONSISTENT WITH THE EXAMPLE SCENARIO USED ACROSS ALL MOLECULAR BIOLOGY CLASSES???

OTHER NAME(S): Biological State

NOTE(S):

Proposed Disposition

Persuasive

Proposed Disposition Comment

Review proposed change with PGx SMEs to ensure change is consistent with their original use case for the concept. Also see disposition comments and recommendation on Gene item a few rows above. Should the two definitions be harmonized?

Outstanding Questions

  • CDISC PGx SMEs: Is the proposed change consistent with your original use case for MolecularBiomarker?
  • Anyone: Can someone provide a comprehensive, realistic and meaningful set of example values that uses the same overall scenario across all classes in the Molecular Biology sub-domain?

Responses

Please add your responses here...


Return to BRIDG