This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Datatypes R2 Issue 92"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The current wording says: | The current wording says: | ||
| − | "...In short, the syntax is "YYYYMMDDHHMMSS.UUUU[+|-ZZzz]" where digits can be omitted..." | + | '''"...In short, the syntax is "YYYYMMDDHHMMSS.UUUU[+|-ZZzz]" where digits can be omitted..."''' |
I propose to change the wording to what it used to be in the version 2 standard, that I found to depict the story better: | I propose to change the wording to what it used to be in the version 2 standard, that I found to depict the story better: | ||
| − | "...In short, the syntax is YYYY[MM[DD[HH[MM[SS[.U[U[U[U]]]]]]]]][+|-ZZ[zz]]" where digits can be omitted..." | + | ""...In short, the syntax is YYYY[MM[DD[HH[MM[SS[.U[U[U[U]]]]]]]]][+|-ZZ[zz]]" where digits can be omitted..."" |
Revision as of 16:59, 7 May 2007
The current wording says: "...In short, the syntax is "YYYYMMDDHHMMSS.UUUU[+|-ZZzz]" where digits can be omitted..."
I propose to change the wording to what it used to be in the version 2 standard, that I found to depict the story better: ""...In short, the syntax is YYYY[MM[DD[HH[MM[SS[.U[U[U[U]]]]]]]]][+|-ZZ[zz]]" where digits can be omitted...""
