This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Datatypes R2 Issue 48"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
'''Thurs Q1 May 2006''': approved in committee - there is no use for an element form of CS | '''Thurs Q1 May 2006''': approved in committee - there is no use for an element form of CS | ||
| + | |||
| + | Editors note: This is an error. There is a need for the element form (for example, for | ||
| + | Participation.subsetCode, and others). This change will not be implemented. | ||
== Links == | == Links == | ||
Back to [[Data Types R2 issues]] | Back to [[Data Types R2 issues]] | ||
Latest revision as of 03:28, 1 June 2007
Data Types Issue 48: CS element form
Introduction
The XML ITS describes an element form for CS, but there appears to be no known case for using it.
Proposal
Propose to remove the Element form for CS, and leave only the attribute form.
This change will be backward compatible.
Discussion
Thurs Q1 May 2006: approved in committee - there is no use for an element form of CS
Editors note: This is an error. There is a need for the element form (for example, for Participation.subsetCode, and others). This change will not be implemented.
Links
Back to Data Types R2 issues
