This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Datatypes R2 Issue 39"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
'''Gunther & Grahame''': suggest to arbitrarily define that a DEL has | '''Gunther & Grahame''': suggest to arbitrarily define that a DEL has | ||
implicit content of a line break. (private email) | implicit content of a line break. (private email) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Resolution == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Motion to note that DEL has implicit content of a line break passed in INM 30 April 2007. | ||
== Links == | == Links == | ||
Back to [[Data Types R2 issues]] | Back to [[Data Types R2 issues]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:14, 30 April 2007
Contents
Data Types Issue 39: DEL null content issue
Introduction
DEL in ENXP and ADXP contain no string but do not have a null Flavor. This violates a constraint in the abstract datatypes that strings must have a length of more than one or a null flavor.
backwards compatibility: this is clarification of an existing issue
Discussion
Gunther & Grahame: suggest to arbitrarily define that a DEL has implicit content of a line break. (private email)
Resolution
Motion to note that DEL has implicit content of a line break passed in INM 30 April 2007.
Links
Back to Data Types R2 issues
