This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here

Difference between revisions of "Datatypes R2 Issue 30"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
== Introduction ==
 
== Introduction ==
  
 +
Why doesn't BAG have a ".literal" property?
 +
 +
Proposal: I guess a simple literal would just be the one for list. Another literal
 +
form could allow for numbers too. Something like:
 +
"[" { <int> <T_literal> } "]"
  
 
? backward compatible.
 
? backward compatible.

Revision as of 23:19, 16 May 2006

Data Types Issue 30: Add Bag.literal

Introduction

Why doesn't BAG have a ".literal" property?

Proposal: I guess a simple literal would just be the one for list. Another literal form could allow for numbers too. Something like:

"[" { <int> <T_literal> } "]"

? backward compatible.

Discussion

Links

Back to Data Types R2 issues