This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Datatypes R2 Issue 30"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
"[" { <int> <T_literal> } "]" | "[" { <int> <T_literal> } "]" | ||
| − | |||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
Revision as of 23:25, 16 May 2006
Data Types Issue 30: Add Bag.literal
Introduction
Why doesn't BAG have a ".literal" property?
Proposal: I guess a simple literal would just be the one for list. Another literal form could allow for numbers too. Something like:
"[" { <int> <T_literal> } "]"
Discussion
Links
Back to Data Types R2 issues
