This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Conference call minutes 2 February 2016"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Michael tan (talk | contribs) (→DAM) |
Michael tan (talk | contribs) (→DAM) |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
* This has to be integrated by David Pyke, but David is not on the call. | * This has to be integrated by David Pyke, but David is not on the call. | ||
* In the previous call the group decided to gray out the allergy and problem list. | * In the previous call the group decided to gray out the allergy and problem list. | ||
− | * The list would then have to be part of another scope of a DAM | + | * The list would then have to be part of another scope of a DAM. There is no such DAM. |
* FHIR does have a resource called "list". | * FHIR does have a resource called "list". | ||
* Discussion arises whether the list should be in the scope of the DAM. | * Discussion arises whether the list should be in the scope of the DAM. | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
* The older versions of the model had different classes such as observations, risks as related classes, but readers always found a class that was missing. | * The older versions of the model had different classes such as observations, risks as related classes, but readers always found a class that was missing. | ||
* Jay suggests to introduce a intermediate level according to the SOAP model to make it less abstract. | * Jay suggests to introduce a intermediate level according to the SOAP model to make it less abstract. | ||
− | * This has also the risk that this | + | * This has also the risk that this leads to comments that certain elements will be missing. |
* A suggestion is to split into 2 figures, where the health concern event is drawn in a separate picture with the different SOAP type of elements. | * A suggestion is to split into 2 figures, where the health concern event is drawn in a separate picture with the different SOAP type of elements. | ||
Revision as of 12:42, 3 February 2016
Contents
Health Concern Topic
Patient Care WG
February 2nd 2016
Attendees:
- Michael Tan – Chair
- Jay Lyle
- Dan Russell
- Hank Mayers
- David Tao
- Russell McDonell
Participation Information
Phone Number: +1 770-657-9270
Participant Passcode: 943377
Web Meeting Info www.webex.com Meeting number 238 558 505
Minutes 26 January
- Motion to approve the minutes by David Tao, second by Hank Mayers.
- 1 abstention, 0 against, 4 approve.
NIB
- Michael has prepared the NIB of Health Concerns for the WGM of May
- Motion to approve and submit the NIB by Jay Lyle, second by David Tao
- 0 abstentions, 0 against, 6 in favor.
DAM
- Hank has submitted a table for chapter 4 of the DAM.
- This has to be integrated by David Pyke, but David is not on the call.
- In the previous call the group decided to gray out the allergy and problem list.
- The list would then have to be part of another scope of a DAM. There is no such DAM.
- FHIR does have a resource called "list".
- Discussion arises whether the list should be in the scope of the DAM.
- If the output lists need characteristics of health concerns that are required from the viewpoint of functionality, then we should consider of making it part of the DAM.
- Examples of such a functionality could be "list purpose" or "list kind".
- In older versions of the health concern model we had various kinds of lists.
- The allergy and problem list in the diagram of the September 2015 ballot were put there as the most important examples of output.
- Suggestion to make the lists more abstract and call it "concern lists".
- We have to think of the appropriate attributes of the concern lists.
- Examples of characteristics of the concern lists are "reconciled" or "unreconciled" lists.
- There were many remarks about the health concern event. A health concern has relationship with all types of events. Readers find this too abstract.
- The older versions of the model had different classes such as observations, risks as related classes, but readers always found a class that was missing.
- Jay suggests to introduce a intermediate level according to the SOAP model to make it less abstract.
- This has also the risk that this leads to comments that certain elements will be missing.
- A suggestion is to split into 2 figures, where the health concern event is drawn in a separate picture with the different SOAP type of elements.
Action items
- Modify diagram to gray out problem list and allergy list: Jay
- Propose text about priorities between health concerns: David
- Distribute Hank’s table to Patient Care list: Michael
Go back to health concern minutes[[1]]