This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Clinicians on FHIR"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(33 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
Return to: [[FHIR Clinical Resources - PCWG]]
 
Return to: [[FHIR Clinical Resources - PCWG]]
 +
<br><br>
 +
This project has '''moved''' to [http://confluence.hl7.org/display/PC/Clinicians+on+FHIR Confluence]
 +
<br>
  
  
−
<br>
+
== '''Clinicians on FHIR listserv''' ==
 +
 
 +
'''Please email [mailto:webmaster@hl7.org?subject=cliniciansfhir webmaster@hl7.org] to request being added to the cliniciansfhir listserv.'''
 +
<br><br>
 
=Background, Objectives and Evolution=
 
=Background, Objectives and Evolution=
 
<br>
 
<br>
  
−
'''Histoy'''
+
'''History'''
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
In 2013, a set of FHIR clinical resources were developed by the FHIR team with some inputs from the Patient Care WG members
 
In 2013, a set of FHIR clinical resources were developed by the FHIR team with some inputs from the Patient Care WG members
  
−
Unfortunately, PCWG members and leadership team were fully consumed by a number of PCWG projects and did not have sufficient time to provide adequate inputs that can do the clinical resources justice
+
At the time the FHIR team desired to create the resources without input relying only on an 80/20 rule - creating what was interpreted as needed to accomodate 80% of the needs.
  
 
Consequently, extensive debates had taken place during and after the first FHIR DSTU ballot. There are obvious harmonization issues between the technical and clinical view points/perspectives
 
Consequently, extensive debates had taken place during and after the first FHIR DSTU ballot. There are obvious harmonization issues between the technical and clinical view points/perspectives
Line 20: Line 26:
 
In addition to the commitments by both the FHIR team and PCWG members to review and enhance/improve the FHIR DSTU1 Clinical Resources, it is agreed that better clinical engagements are highly desirable and beneficial to progressing the FHIR clinical resources toward DSTU2
 
In addition to the commitments by both the FHIR team and PCWG members to review and enhance/improve the FHIR DSTU1 Clinical Resources, it is agreed that better clinical engagements are highly desirable and beneficial to progressing the FHIR clinical resources toward DSTU2
  
−
At the May 2014 (Phoenix) WGM, the FHIR team approached PCWG leadership team to discuss the idea of a clinical connectathon. It was emphasized that this would be very different from the technical connectathon in which the participants focus solely on the technical aspect of interoperability. The clinical connectathon will be focused on clinical interoperability
+
At the May 2014 (Phoenix) WGM, the FHIR team approached PCWG leadership team to discuss the idea of a clinical connectathon. It was emphasized that this would be very different from the technical connectathon in which the participants focus solely on the technical aspect of interoperability. The clinical connectathon will be focused on validating the FHIR resources clinically. 
  
 +
<br>
 +
'''Name'''
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
'''Post May 2015 Paris WGM Decision'''
 
'''Post May 2015 Paris WGM Decision'''
 
<br>
 
<br>
−
The objectives/purposes of the ''Clinician Connectathon'' were revisited during the May 2015 WGM.
+
The use of the term ''Clinician Connectathon'' was revisited during the May 2015 WGM.
−
<br> The consensus was that these events were not actually ''connectathon'' in the similar way to the technical FHIR connectathon events.
 
−
 
 
−
<br> The set of key objectives established since the first event in May 2014 WGM were re-examined. It was agreed that these objectives are still valid and accurately reflect the purposes of the events:
 
−
: - to test the accuracy, validity and usability of clinical resources
 
−
: - to identify any issues arising from clinical use of clinical resources tested
 
−
: - to provide recommendations to enhance/improve the clinical resources tested
 
−
: - to identify lessons learnt such that future FHIR resources development methodology and processes may be improved
 
−
 
 
 
<br> Based on the re-examination of the purposes, it was agreed that a more appropriate concept should replace the current ''clinician connectathon'' concept moving forward.
 
<br> Based on the re-examination of the purposes, it was agreed that a more appropriate concept should replace the current ''clinician connectathon'' concept moving forward.
 +
<br> The consensus was that these events were not actually ''connectathon'' in the similar way to the technical FHIR connectathon events.  Multiple other names were considered. 
 +
<br> The consensus was that '''Clinicians on FHIR''' is best suited to the intended purposes.  The name '''Clinicians on FHIR''' was adopted. 
  
−
<br> The consensus was that '''Clinicians on FHIR''' is best suited to the intended purposes.
+
<br>
−
 
+
'''Objectives'''
 +
<br> The set of key objectives established at the first event in May 2014 WGM were re-examined and updated October 3, 2017.
 +
: The Goals of the Clinicians on FHIR activities are to:
 +
: * Test FHIR Resources for:
 +
::      -- Accuracy (clinical knowledge and clinical practices)
 +
::      -- Validity (designed correctly for the purpose of clinical practice and clinical use)
 +
::      -- Usability (useful and usable for the clinical story tested against)
 +
: * Identify any interoperability issues arising from clinical use of FHIR resources tested
 +
: * Provide recommendations to enhance/improve FHIR
 +
: * Improve FHIR development methodology and processes to involve clinicians from inception
 +
: * Facilitate education to clinicians regarding FHIR
  
 
=Owning Committee/Workgroup=
 
=Owning Committee/Workgroup=
Line 46: Line 58:
 
==Leadership==
 
==Leadership==
 
* ''Clinical Leaders''
 
* ''Clinical Leaders''
 +
 
:: Elaine Ayres
 
:: Elaine Ayres
 
:: Stephen Chu
 
:: Stephen Chu
−
:: Russ Leftwich
 
 
:: Laura Heermann-Langford
 
:: Laura Heermann-Langford
 
:: Emma Jones
 
:: Emma Jones
 +
:: Russ Leftwich
 +
:: Viet Nguyen
 +
:: James McClay
  
 
* ''FHIR Liaisons''
 
* ''FHIR Liaisons''
 
:: David Hay
 
:: David Hay
−
:: Viet Nguyen
 
 
:: Lloyd McKenzie  
 
:: Lloyd McKenzie  
  
 
<br>
 
<br>
−
 
  
 
=Events=
 
=Events=
 
<br>
 
<br>
 +
'''Current'''
 +
* [[Clinician on FHIR 2017]]
 +
  
 
* [[Clinician on FHIR 2016]]
 
* [[Clinician on FHIR 2016]]
−
<br>
 
  
 
* [[Clinicians on FHIR 2015]] (renamed from Clinician Connectathon post May 2015 Paris WGM)
 
* [[Clinicians on FHIR 2015]] (renamed from Clinician Connectathon post May 2015 Paris WGM)
Line 72: Line 87:
 
* [[Clinician Connectathon 2014]]
 
* [[Clinician Connectathon 2014]]
  
 +
* [[Clinician on FHIR 2018]]
 +
 +
<br>
 +
 +
''' Upcoming'''
 +
* [[Clinician on FHIR MedInfo 2019]]
  
 
<br>
 
<br>
Line 79: Line 100:
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
==Key links for Clinicians on FHIR==
 
==Key links for Clinicians on FHIR==
−
[http://clinfhir.com clinFHIR]
+
[http://clinfhir.com clinFHIR tool]<br>
 +
[https://fhirblog.com/ Hay on FHIR blog]
 
<br>
 
<br>
  
 +
[https://allscripts.primetime.mediaplatform.com/#!/video/3760/HL7+Clinician-on-FHIR+Overview+and+ClinFHIR+Tool+Demo Clinnician-on-FHIR Overview and clinFHIR Tool Demo]
 +
<br>
 +
[https://fhirblog.com/2016/10/17/logical-models-in-fhir/ Logical Model in FHIR]
  
 +
<br>
 
<br> * [[Referral and Transition/Transfer of Care]]
 
<br> * [[Referral and Transition/Transfer of Care]]
 
<br> * [[Clinical Assessment]]
 
<br> * [[Clinical Assessment]]

Latest revision as of 20:39, 16 September 2019


Return to: Patient Care
Return to: FHIR Clinical Resources - PCWG

This project has moved to Confluence


Clinicians on FHIR listserv

Please email webmaster@hl7.org to request being added to the cliniciansfhir listserv.

Background, Objectives and Evolution


History
In 2013, a set of FHIR clinical resources were developed by the FHIR team with some inputs from the Patient Care WG members

At the time the FHIR team desired to create the resources without input relying only on an 80/20 rule - creating what was interpreted as needed to accomodate 80% of the needs.

Consequently, extensive debates had taken place during and after the first FHIR DSTU ballot. There are obvious harmonization issues between the technical and clinical view points/perspectives

In addition to the commitments by both the FHIR team and PCWG members to review and enhance/improve the FHIR DSTU1 Clinical Resources, it is agreed that better clinical engagements are highly desirable and beneficial to progressing the FHIR clinical resources toward DSTU2

At the May 2014 (Phoenix) WGM, the FHIR team approached PCWG leadership team to discuss the idea of a clinical connectathon. It was emphasized that this would be very different from the technical connectathon in which the participants focus solely on the technical aspect of interoperability. The clinical connectathon will be focused on validating the FHIR resources clinically.


Name
Post May 2015 Paris WGM Decision
The use of the term Clinician Connectathon was revisited during the May 2015 WGM.
Based on the re-examination of the purposes, it was agreed that a more appropriate concept should replace the current clinician connectathon concept moving forward.
The consensus was that these events were not actually connectathon in the similar way to the technical FHIR connectathon events. Multiple other names were considered.
The consensus was that Clinicians on FHIR is best suited to the intended purposes. The name Clinicians on FHIR was adopted.


Objectives
The set of key objectives established at the first event in May 2014 WGM were re-examined and updated October 3, 2017.

The Goals of the Clinicians on FHIR activities are to:
* Test FHIR Resources for:
-- Accuracy (clinical knowledge and clinical practices)
-- Validity (designed correctly for the purpose of clinical practice and clinical use)
-- Usability (useful and usable for the clinical story tested against)
* Identify any interoperability issues arising from clinical use of FHIR resources tested
* Provide recommendations to enhance/improve FHIR
* Improve FHIR development methodology and processes to involve clinicians from inception
* Facilitate education to clinicians regarding FHIR

Owning Committee/Workgroup


Patient Care

Leadership

  • Clinical Leaders
Elaine Ayres
Stephen Chu
Laura Heermann-Langford
Emma Jones
Russ Leftwich
Viet Nguyen
James McClay
  • FHIR Liaisons
David Hay
Lloyd McKenzie


Events


Current



Upcoming


Useful Resources


Key links for Clinicians on FHIR

clinFHIR tool
Hay on FHIR blog

Clinnician-on-FHIR Overview and clinFHIR Tool Demo
Logical Model in FHIR



* Referral and Transition/Transfer of Care
* Clinical Assessment


Topics of Interest:
* Observation vs Condition
* Observation, Clinical Assessment and Clinical Annotation

Storyboards



Other References and Resources

  • Clinical Scenarios analysis:
- Chronic Care
- Acute Care
- Adverse Reaction
- summary of 3 chosen scenarios
- Nutrition Assessment


  • Care Plan for Immunization:
http://fhirblog.com/2014/05/29/profiling-a-fhir-careplan-for-immunizations/
http://fhirblog.com/2014/05/30/profiling-a-fhir-careplan-for-immunizations-part-2/
http://fhirblog.com/2014/05/25/using-fhir-to-record-immunizations/



Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=Clinicians_on_FHIR&oldid=166650"