Clarification on comments re AminoAcidSequenceFeature
Return to BRIDG
Need clarification on comments re AminoAcidSequenceFeature (row 20)
Current Definitions
AminoAcidSequenceFeature
DEFINITION: An annotation assigned to a defined amino acid physical location.
EXAMPLE(S): alpha helices, glycosylation sites, DNA binding domains
OTHER NAME(S):
NOTE(S):
AminoAcidSequenceFeature.typeCode
DEFINITION: A coded value that specifies a group of amino acids within a protein that confer certain characteristics upon that protein, and may be important for its overall function.
EXAMPLE(S): glycosylation site, binding site, site of post-translational modification
OTHER NAME(S):
NOTE(S): [Glycosylation Site:C16643, C37901; Binding Site:C13671]
Associations
- Included in AminoAcidPhysicalLocation
- Be reported by MolecularSequenceAnnotation
Ballot Comment
do you need a databasenamecode? Or are you restricting to a single source?
Current Disposition
Pending Input From Submitter
Proposed Disposition Comment
Need clarification - are the TYPES of amino acid sequence features (typeCode) something that is identified by a database identifier, is a CD insufficient? Or is this referring to a new attribute to capture something besides the typeCode attribute? (currently there's only one attribute in this class)
Outstanding Questions
- Is this comment suggesting that AminoAcidSequenceFeatures are captured in databases and therefore have identifiers like Proteins, Genes, Pathways, etc.?
- Currently this class only has one attribute (typeCode above) - should we add a databaseNameCode and identifier?
- Or is this comment suggesting we should change the typeCode attribute into a databaseNameCode?
Responses
Please add your responses here...
Return to BRIDG