This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Clarification on comments re AminoAcidSequenceFeature

From HL7Wiki
Revision as of 05:05, 8 December 2015 by Wverhoef (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NOTOC__ Return to BRIDG ===Need clarification on comments re AminoAcidSequenceFeature (row 20)=== ====Current Definitions==== '''AminoAcidSequenceFeature''' DEFINITI...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Return to BRIDG

Need clarification on comments re AminoAcidSequenceFeature (row 20)

Current Definitions

AminoAcidSequenceFeature

DEFINITION: An annotation assigned to a defined amino acid physical location.

EXAMPLE(S): alpha helices, glycosylation sites, DNA binding domains

OTHER NAME(S):

NOTE(S):

AminoAcidSequenceFeature.typeCode

DEFINITION: A coded value that specifies a group of amino acids within a protein that confer certain characteristics upon that protein, and may be important for its overall function.

EXAMPLE(S): glycosylation site, binding site, site of post-translational modification

OTHER NAME(S):

NOTE(S): [Glycosylation Site:C16643, C37901; Binding Site:C13671]

Associations

  • Included in AminoAcidPhysicalLocation
  • Be reported by MolecularSequenceAnnotation

Ballot Comment

do you need a databasenamecode? Or are you restricting to a single source?

Current Disposition

Pending Input From Submitter

Proposed Disposition Comment

Need clarification - are the TYPES of amino acid sequence features (typeCode) something that is identified by a database identifier, is a CD insufficient? Or is this referring to a new attribute to capture something besides the typeCode attribute? (currently there's only one attribute in this class)

Outstanding Questions

  • Is this comment suggesting that AminoAcidSequenceFeatures are captured in databases and therefore have identifiers like Proteins, Genes, Pathways, etc.?
  • Currently this class only has one attribute (typeCode above) - should we add a databaseNameCode and identifier?
  • Or is this comment suggesting we should change the typeCode attribute into a databaseNameCode?

Responses

Please add your responses here...


Return to BRIDG