CTS2N - 7-Feb-12

Minutes 7-Feb-2012

Attendees

• Ana Estelrich (AE)
• Jim Case
• Ken Rubin (KR)
• Monica Harry
• Senthil Nachimuthu (SN)
• Wendy Huang (WH)
• Jan
• Brian Schwallier
• Russell Hamm

Announcements

• A wiki has been established for managing artifacts. CTS 2 Normative Home
• Craig Stancl is leading effort for OMG Finalization Task Force, and CTS 2 implementation Guide for IHTSDO.

Approach

• RH - Should we start with PIM and map to SFM? Start with SFM and map to PIM? Does it matter?
• AE - Suggest we start with SFM, and map to PIM.
• SN - Should also bring comments to the FTF.
• AE - comments to FTF were due Feb 1. New comments will be read by the FTF, but may not be implemented.
• AE - Ana has taken the PHAST impl of CTS 2 and compared to SFM. Focusing on Read functionality. Will have something able to present and compare in the coming weeks.
• AE - Ana has began an initial enumeration of functionality from the SFM.

Goal:  ''We will develop a functional matrix based off requirements specified in the SFM.  We will then map functionality represented in the OMG PIM, the PHAST implementation and other to form a functional matrix.  This matrix will serve as a working document to develop an updated SFM based on actual implementations.''

Rational

• RH - Should we include rational in the CTS 2 SFM outlining decisions made in developing the OMG PIM?
• AE - This would be useful
• RH - The idea would be to provide background in the SFM to discuss decisions made in developing the technical specification.
• KR - Much of this would be represented int he OMG Submission. Look to that as a source.

Goal: We will include rational in the SFM outlining why decisions were made in the PIM.  This will provide guidance to SFM readers, and justification for the requirements.  

Publishing Infrastructure

• Wiki used to manage meeting minutes, agendas, and resources. CTS 2 Normative Home
• Development of SFM will be done in HSSP SFM Template.

• Author volunteers include
  • Senthil Nachimuthu
  • Ana Estelrich
  • Russell Hamm
  • Others?

Artifacts

• RH - How can HL7 access OMG artifacts?
• KR - John Quinn holds the OMG membership for HL7. HL7 and OMG share access to artifacts. CTS 2 can decide who has access to OMG artifacts for the CTS 2 project. This will not be a barrier.

Action item: Take an FTF vote to make documents public, and make availability to CTS 2 Normative wiki.

CTS 2 Normative Development Artifacts

• OMG PIM
• PHAST
• HL7 SFM
• Functional matrix (in progress)

Action Items

• Russ to post wiki information for minutes
• Discuss with the OMG FTF to have a vote to make the OMG documents public and available on CTS 2 Normative wiki.
• Russ to ping Frank / Berndt on their CTS 2 efforts.

Items for Next Agenda

1. Infrastructure / asset review
   1. Wiki CTS 2 Normative Home
   2. Project documentation
   3. Functional Requirement Mapping
2. HL7 Conformance Profile
   1. What should it look like (messaging / browsing / mapping)
   2. What required functionality
3. Value Set Grammar
   1. What (if anything) is implemented by PHAST or Mayo?

Issues for Discussion

• At a minimum, should HL7 Conformance Profile be part of the Normative CTS 2??