CS May 2012 WGM Minutes

• Ballot reconciliation
  • No negatives received
• Pharmacy alignment, short report from Pharmacy, further work Q4, CS at Pharmacy
• Next ballot
  • Outstanding change requests, 044 Patient Care about allergies, 106 ReasonCode for PC and PA.
  • Motion to remove Topics, never passed (TODO get the date of this and the motion)

From: owner-clinicalstatement@lists.hl7.org On Behalf Of FREAN, Isobel Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 17:12 To: HL7 Clinical Statement Cc: Rik Smithies; Buitendijk, Hans (H USA) Subject: EMotion Clinical Statement To Clinical Statement Working Group I move the following eMotions:

1. Remove the Clinical Statement Topics - as topics will be handled via templates in the respective domains. 2. Update the Supporting Clinical Statement (universal) CMET and drop the Supporting Clinical Statement (Minimal) CMET.

• • Update on ballot quality report (2 issues in there)
• CMET list - email 22 Feb.
  • Remove old CMET. How do we deprecate it?
• Product Brief - email 29th March
  • http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=40
  • Review main text of content, some parts don’t make sense.
• 3 year plan - Dave Hamill reply to co-chairs 10 May (TODO show the details)
• Need for a new project for maintenance and housekeeping
  • check schema is good, anecdotal evidence that it is not
    • From: owner-mnm@lists.hl7.org [1] On Behalf Of dmead@comcast.net

Sent: 28 July 2011 18:25 To: Modeling & Methodology Subject: Source Of, Target Of

Hi,

The ICSR is using an act choice structure based on Clinical Statement. In both ICSR and CS, there are recusive act relationships to allow chaining things. In both, again, the RMIM lables show the act relationships as "sourceOf", "targetOf", 'sourceOf1"

I am now finding that, when this gets translated to XML, I am seeing, as elements, "outboundRelationship1, 'outboundRelationship2, "inboundRelationship".

What is the mapping here? Is it source - outbound, target to inbound?

sourceOf - outbound1? sourceOf1 - outbound2?

Mead

• • create examples against schema
  • ongoing RIM changes etc
  • chase up any mentions x-domains, harmonization issues etc
• Discussion re CS and FHIR, SAIF etc. if time permits