This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

CSCR-111 Product relationship to Supply Act should be non mandatory in CS

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back to Clinical Statement Change Requests page.

Submitted by: Rik Smithies Revision date: <<Revision Date>>
Submitted date: 11-Sep-12 Change request ID: CSCR-111


From Rx alignment sheet (posted to list 27th July)

Product relationship to Supply Act should be relaxed in CS. It is currently mandatory in CS, but not in RX.

It is mandatory in CS since supply has to supply something. But product can also be on the organizer instead. Seems ok to relax to optional 0..*, with note to say need a product somewhere in the associated classes.


  • todo



Stephen states, needs "elsewhere" to be more specific. Suggest must be an organizer class.

Organizer currently has no PRD. Suggest to add this as a shadow and document that it is to be used if there is not one on Supply. Document Supply PRD to say, 0..* but must be PRD either on supply or on its parent Organizer.

Recommended Action Items


Proposal as in dicussion section: Motion to approve change: Stephen, Hans Against: 0; Abstain: 1; In Favor: 5 carried