Difference between revisions of "CSCR-093-OO-Add performer.noteText"
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
== Resolution == | == Resolution == | ||
| + | 5-Feb-09 - Alternative could be another act, but then a lot more is required. Another option is the Annotation CMET. Either way, it must be clarified at what point one would use a note and when a full-blown act is more appropriate. This use case seems simple, and administrative. If clinical, then use Annotation CMET or a related Act if it needs more then text (e.g., coded, etc.). This clarification should be included in the attribute level description. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Motion: To accept as proposed with attribute definition clarification. Patrick, Austin. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Discussion: Willing to post to MnM to see whether they can resolve the approach whether performer.note could be deprecated and then use the act consistently. Charlie will post to hot topics. | ||
Revision as of 22:23, 5 February 2009
Back to Clinical Statement Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Patrick Loyd | Revision date: 15-Jan-2009 |
| Submitted date: 15-Jan-2009 | Change request ID: CSCR-093 |
Issue
- Add performer.noteText
Recommendation
Rationale
- Used for specimen collector notes, needed to harmonize with lab templates
Discussion
Recommended Action Items
- Add performer.noteText
- description: used to collect notes about the procedure from the performer. Not used for notes which belong in the patient record.
- noteText: ED [0..1] optional
Resolution
5-Feb-09 - Alternative could be another act, but then a lot more is required. Another option is the Annotation CMET. Either way, it must be clarified at what point one would use a note and when a full-blown act is more appropriate. This use case seems simple, and administrative. If clinical, then use Annotation CMET or a related Act if it needs more then text (e.g., coded, etc.). This clarification should be included in the attribute level description.
Motion: To accept as proposed with attribute definition clarification. Patrick, Austin.
Discussion: Willing to post to MnM to see whether they can resolve the approach whether performer.note could be deprecated and then use the act consistently. Charlie will post to hot topics.
